Exporter Dynamics and Partial-Year Effects

Bernard, Andrew B.; Massari, Renzo; Reyes, José-Daniel; Taglioni, Daria

doi:10.1596/29061

Cited by 7 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Accordingly, we apply a partial-year effect correction based on Bernard, Bøler, Massari, Reyes, and Taglioni (2017). The results for the coefficients of interest are similar to those obtained in the baseline specification (Appendix B.1).…”

Section: Additional Robustness Analysessupporting

confidence: 62%

“…Nonetheless, we check the robustness of our results to a correction proposed by Bernard, Bøler, Massari, Reyes, and Taglioni (2017). In our dataset, exports are defined at the firm-productcountry-year level.…”

Section: A2 Aggregate Descriptivesmentioning

confidence: 89%

“…18 In particular, the coefficient on F Yijp,t−1 is expected to be positive due to a 'partial year effect' that is unrelated to our prediction. Bernard, Bøler, Massari, Reyes, and Taglioni (2017) show that correcting for the overestimation of first-year sales growth rates amongst surviving firms doubles the contribution of exporters' extensive (entry and exit) margins to total export growth. Nevertheless, since our interest here is not in the coefficient on F Yijp,t−1, this is not a central concern for our analysis.…”

Section: Export Growthmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…Growth rates between the second (complete) calendar year and the first ('partial') calendar year would then be artificially high. Bernard, Bøler, Massari, Reyes, and Taglioni (2017) and Berthou and Vicard (2015) show that age patterns in growth are less pronounced once the precise timing of new exporters' entry is taken into account.…”

Section: A2 Aggregate Descriptivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1: Growth Regressions withBernard et al (2017) Partial Year Effect Correction The table reports the results of regressions of firm sales growth rates on our indicators for first year of an export spell (F Yijpt−1), first exported product (F Pip) and first export destination (F Mij), separately and for three double and one triple interaction(s), together with controls for gravity variables (detailed in Table4notes), firm TFP growth and different sets of fixed effects as in specification (4) after applying Bernard et al (2017) partial-year effect correction. We only report estimates for the triple interaction (F Yijpt−1 × F Pip × F Mij) coefficient, for comparison with Table4.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Sequential Exporting Across Countries and Products

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Additional Robustness Analysessupporting

confidence: 62%

Section: A2 Aggregate Descriptivesmentioning

confidence: 89%

Section: Export Growthmentioning

confidence: 93%

Section: A2 Aggregate Descriptivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Sequential Exporting Across Countries and Products

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One‐off export events

Geishecker

Schröder

Srensen

2019

Canadian J of Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Isolated single‐month, one‐off export transactions (observed once in a 49‐month window) turn out to be the dominant spell length in granular firm–product–destination trade data. Moreover, on average, for an export‐active firm, such one‐off events generate a significant part of foreign sales. These patterns cannot be explained by the lumpiness of trade (e.g., seasonal shipments), nor do they sit well with available trade models. To reconcile theory with the data, we introduce passive (i.e., unsolicited buyer‐side driven) exporting in addition to proactive exporting. Our empirical investigation establishes novel stylized facts on firm and destination characteristics associated with one‐off exporting.

show abstract

Import liberalization and export product mix

Luong

Fan

Lai

et al. 2022

Canadian J of Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper develops a monopolistic competition model of multi‐product firms to explain the effect of trade liberalization on the product mix of multi‐product exporting firms. The model shows that input‐tariff reduction leads to increases in a firm's export values, especially for products that are farther from a firm's core competency. To test the theoretical predictions, we use the merged data built upon the highly disaggregated Chinese firm‐level production data and customs data for 2000–2006. Consistent with the theory, the positive impact of input trade liberalization on export value is found to be more pronounced for peripheral products, and input‐tariff reduction also expands a firm's product scope, affecting firm's average productivity.

show abstract

Exporter Dynamics and Partial-Year Effects

Cited by 7 publications

References 0 publications

Sequential Exporting Across Countries and Products

Sequential Exporting Across Countries and Products

One‐off export events

Import liberalization and export product mix

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About