2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure to Host Resistance Mechanisms Drives Evolution of Bacterial Virulence in Plants

Abstract: Bacterial pathogenicity to plants and animals has evolved through an arms race of attack and defense. Key players are bacterial effector proteins, which are delivered through the type III secretion system and suppress basal defenses . In plants, varietal resistance to disease is based on recognition of effectors by the products of resistance (R) genes . When recognized, the effector or in this scenario, avirulence (Avr) protein triggers the hypersensitive resistance reaction (HR), which generates antimicrobial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
164
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
164
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results have been reported previously where an experimental evolution approach was used to investigate pathogen adaptation in completely unrelated environments such as mouse macrophage (Ensminger et al, 2012) and cystic fibrosis-like culture conditions in the presence and absence of fluoroquinolone antibiotics . In addition, unlike some other studies of the pathogen evolution in planta (Pitman et al, 2005;Lovell et al, 2009), our analysis did not detect the complete loss or gain of any gene among the bacterial strains compared with the parent.…”
contrasting
confidence: 93%
“…Similar results have been reported previously where an experimental evolution approach was used to investigate pathogen adaptation in completely unrelated environments such as mouse macrophage (Ensminger et al, 2012) and cystic fibrosis-like culture conditions in the presence and absence of fluoroquinolone antibiotics . In addition, unlike some other studies of the pathogen evolution in planta (Pitman et al, 2005;Lovell et al, 2009), our analysis did not detect the complete loss or gain of any gene among the bacterial strains compared with the parent.…”
contrasting
confidence: 93%
“…However, the coverage of scaffolds 43 and 100 within our Por 1_6 assembly is no different than that of the MLST genes in its own genome. Although we cannot rule out the presence of a low copy number plasmid, it is likely that Por 1_6 contains a plasmid integrated into the main genome, as noted for other P. syringae plasmids (Jackson et al 2000;Rohmer et al 2003;Pitman et al 2005).…”
Section: Por 1_ _6 Likely Harbors An Integrated Plasmidmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…How can this requirement for precise functionality be reconciled with an additional role as receptors of the cognate effector proteins? Phytopathogenic bacteria evolve faster than plant hosts because of their higher mutation rates and shorter generation times; in addition, effector proteins are functionally redundant and therefore individually dispensable (Pitman et al, 2005). Furthermore, AvrPto and AvrPtoB are structurally unrelated; hence, recognition through the same subset of Pto residues provides an additional constraint to evolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%