1991
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4603(91)90054-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure to smoking-relevant cues: Effects on desire to smoke and topographical components of smoking behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

7
119
5
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
119
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the predictions of appetitive-incentive [22] and incentive-sensitization [23] models of drug motivation that suggest drug cues prime central motivational systems mediating pleasure and positive affect, the limited number of studies assessing mood during cigarette craving have, in line with associative-withdrawal models of drug motivation, observed self-reported negative affect to accompany craving, and for negative affect manipulation to increase craving [24][25][26][27][28] . Thus, these observations of cue-elicited withdrawal-like responses appear to implicate relative right hemisphere involvement in smoking-related urges.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In contrast to the predictions of appetitive-incentive [22] and incentive-sensitization [23] models of drug motivation that suggest drug cues prime central motivational systems mediating pleasure and positive affect, the limited number of studies assessing mood during cigarette craving have, in line with associative-withdrawal models of drug motivation, observed self-reported negative affect to accompany craving, and for negative affect manipulation to increase craving [24][25][26][27][28] . Thus, these observations of cue-elicited withdrawal-like responses appear to implicate relative right hemisphere involvement in smoking-related urges.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The hypothesis that these stimuli can acquire reinforcing properties (i.e., sustain operant responding) and promote human smoking is widely endorsed by theoretical models (e.g., Caggiula et al 2001;Chiamulera 2005;Conklin and Tiffany 2002;Rose and Levin 1991) and has generally been supported by empirical studies of human smoking (Lazev et al 1999;Payne et al 1991). For example, stimuli with no historical affiliation to smoking can acquire conditional stimulus properties in the laboratory when they are paired with a period of free access to smoking (Lazev et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nicotine is the principal psychoactive component of cigarette smoke and non-nicotine stimuli that become associated with nicotine delivery are thought to play an important role in the maintenance of smoking and in its relapse after attempted quitting (Caggiula et al, 2001;Childress et al, 1993;Niaura et al, 1989;O'Brien et al, 1998). Human studies have demonstrated that smoking cues increase the rate, intensity, and time of smoking (Mucha et al, 1998;Surawy et al, 1985) and significantly enhance desire to smoke (Drobes and Tiffany, 1997;Droungas et al, 1995;Lazev et al, 1999;Payne et al, 1991;Tiffany and Hakenewerth, 1991). Smoking denicotinized cigarettes (ie cue alone) produces comparable levels of smoke intake, satisfaction, and reduction of craving and withdrawal compared to smoking nicotine-containing cigarettes (ie cue plus nicotine) (Butschky et al, 1995;Dallery et al, 2003;Gross et al, 1997;Rose et al, 2000;Shahan et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%