2003
DOI: 10.1554/0014-3820(2003)057[0487:eoagva]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression of Additive Genetic Variances and Covariances for Wild Radish Floral Traits: Comparison Between Field and Greenhouse Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, although additive genetic variances and r MF may be affected by rearing environment (Conner et al 2003) and different traits may be affected differently, there is no reason to believe that our results are artifacts of laboratory rearing conditions. Even if laboratory conditions affect r MF and heritabilities of morphological traits, there is no known reason to expect this effect to differ with trait function or degree of sexual dimorphism so as to generate the observed patterns.…”
Section: Evolution Of Heritabilitymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Furthermore, although additive genetic variances and r MF may be affected by rearing environment (Conner et al 2003) and different traits may be affected differently, there is no reason to believe that our results are artifacts of laboratory rearing conditions. Even if laboratory conditions affect r MF and heritabilities of morphological traits, there is no known reason to expect this effect to differ with trait function or degree of sexual dimorphism so as to generate the observed patterns.…”
Section: Evolution Of Heritabilitymentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Floral traits were highly correlated, in particular the lengths of the filaments and corolla tube (which together determine anther placement), but no significant correlation occurred between floral and vegetative traits (Conner and Via 1993). Conner et al (2003) later found that heritability estimates for six of these floral traits were much lower in the field than in the above greenhouse study.…”
Section: Description and Account Of Variationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It is also noteworthy that the expression of many developmental pathways (such as flowering time, shade avoidance) depends on environmental cues, such that the expression of integration/modularity may vary by environment (Waitt and Levin, 1993;Pigliucci and Marlow, 2001;Conner et al, 2003;Brock and Weinig, 2007). For example, in Phlox drummondii, the correlation structure among traits differed with different nutrient availability (Waitt and Levin, 1993), in Raphanus raphinistrum, the correlation structure among floral traits differed between field and greenhouse environments (Conner et al, 2003), and in A. thaliana, changes in vernalization, season length and light composition affected patterns of trait correlation structure (Pigliucci and Marlow, 2001;Brock and Weinig, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in Phlox drummondii, the correlation structure among traits differed with different nutrient availability (Waitt and Levin, 1993), in Raphanus raphinistrum, the correlation structure among floral traits differed between field and greenhouse environments (Conner et al, 2003), and in A. thaliana, changes in vernalization, season length and light composition affected patterns of trait correlation structure (Pigliucci and Marlow, 2001;Brock and Weinig, 2007). Also of relevance to the current study, photoperiod and temperature may have indirect effects on floral meristem development and floral organ identity genes in A. thaliana (Okamuro et al, 1993(Okamuro et al, , 1996, and such organ-specific effects may be one mechanism by which environment could influence integration/ modularity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%