2011
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2011.264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression of CD44v6 is an independent prognostic factor for poor survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract: Abstract. CD44v6 has been causally associated with the development of metastases and with poor prognosis in various human malignancies. To elucidate the clinicopathological significance of CD44v6 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), the present study aimed to investigate the expression of CD44v6 using immunohistological techniques. Using specific antibodies against CD44v6 and CD44s, expression of the proteins was analyzed immunohistochemically in 63 primary esophageal ESCCs, which were prev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gene expression analysis (GSE37993) further indicated downregulation of epithelial splicing regulatory protein (ESRP)1 (−29.0-fold vs. CD44L; p<0.001) and ESRP2 (−5.4-fold vs. CD44L; p<0.001), which regulate alternative splicing of CD44 mRNA 55 , in purified CD44H cells. As CD44v6 expression has been implicated in ESCC, 39 , 49 , 57 we continued to examine its expression in the context of keratinocyte EMT. Indeed, both CD44H cells ( Supplementary Figure S6C–E ) and TGF-β-treated CD44L ( Supplementary Figure S7 ) cells displayed decreased cell surface CD44v6 protein expression.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene expression analysis (GSE37993) further indicated downregulation of epithelial splicing regulatory protein (ESRP)1 (−29.0-fold vs. CD44L; p<0.001) and ESRP2 (−5.4-fold vs. CD44L; p<0.001), which regulate alternative splicing of CD44 mRNA 55 , in purified CD44H cells. As CD44v6 expression has been implicated in ESCC, 39 , 49 , 57 we continued to examine its expression in the context of keratinocyte EMT. Indeed, both CD44H cells ( Supplementary Figure S6C–E ) and TGF-β-treated CD44L ( Supplementary Figure S7 ) cells displayed decreased cell surface CD44v6 protein expression.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have demonstrated the overexpression of CD44v6 in several cancers, including but not limited to head and neck, breast, ovarian, prostate, colon and colorectal cancer ( 6 11 ), whereas CD44v6 expression in normal tissue is restricted to the squamous and transitional epithelium ( 12 , 13 ). Additionally, the overexpression of CD44v6 is associated with a poor prognosis and a more aggressive, chemoresistant disease in several cancer types ( 7 9 , 14 18 ). In metastatic tissue, a retained or increased CD44v6 expression compared to primary tumors has been demonstrated in certain types of cancer, such as squamous cell carcinomas, prostate cancer and ovarian cancer ( 7 , 9 , 19 , 20 ), whereas studies on colorectal cancers have reported heterogeneous results ( 21 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, overexpression of the CD44v6 variant has been found in the majority of squamous cell carcinomas and a variety of adenocarcinomas, but has not frequently been observed in non-epithelial tumors ( 18 ). In this way, CD44v6 has been described to negatively impact the prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma ( 19 ), colorectal cancer (CRC) ( 20 , 21 ), osteosarcoma ( 22 ), esophageal carcinoma ( 22 ), gastric cancer ( 23 ) as well as head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) ( 24 , 25 ) patients, among others. Moreover, altered CD44v6 expression has been associated with tumor development, migration, invasion and metastatic potential in a broad variety of tumor types, such as HNSCC ( 24 ), oral cancer ( 26 ), laryngeal carcinoma ( 27 ), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, gastric cancer ( 28 – 30 ), pancreatic cancer ( 11 , 31 ), liver cancer ( 32 , 33 ), CRC ( 34 ), lung cancer ( 35 , 36 ), breast carcinoma ( 37 ) and gynecologic malignancies ( 38 ) such as ovarian ( 39 , 40 ) and prostate cancer ( 41 ), among others ( Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Cd44 Alternative Splicing As a Source Of Taasmentioning
confidence: 99%