2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2015.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expressions for the Moore–Penrose inverse of block matrices involving the Schur complement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ln k r (x r |x pa(r ) ; ξ r ). (11) We have an expectation value of a function, ∂ ∂ξ (r ;i) ln k r (x r |x pa(r ) ; ξ r ), that is local in two ways: All arguments of this function, the states and the parameters, are local with respect to the node r . However, the distribution p * ξ , used for the evaluation of the expectation value, depends on the full set of parameters ξ .…”
Section: Locality Of the Euclidean Gradientmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…ln k r (x r |x pa(r ) ; ξ r ). (11) We have an expectation value of a function, ∂ ∂ξ (r ;i) ln k r (x r |x pa(r ) ; ξ r ), that is local in two ways: All arguments of this function, the states and the parameters, are local with respect to the node r . However, the distribution p * ξ , used for the evaluation of the expectation value, depends on the full set of parameters ξ .…”
Section: Locality Of the Euclidean Gradientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We exemplify the derivative (11) in the context of binary neurons where it leads to a natural learning rule.…”
Section: Locality Of the Euclidean Gradientmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations