2015
DOI: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1089935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expressive and receptive language skills in preschool children from a socially disadvantaged area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These types of parenting differences have been posited as contributing to the higher prevalence of language difficulties in children experiencing adversity (Conger et al., ). Where population studies suggest around six to ten percent of young children have persistent speech, language, and communication needs (Law, Boyle, Harris, Harkness, & Nye, ), the rate increases to around one‐third within cohorts experiencing adversity (Law, Rush, Schoon, & Parsons, ; Ryan, Gibbon, & O'Shea, ).…”
Section: Maternal Responsiveness and Child Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These types of parenting differences have been posited as contributing to the higher prevalence of language difficulties in children experiencing adversity (Conger et al., ). Where population studies suggest around six to ten percent of young children have persistent speech, language, and communication needs (Law, Boyle, Harris, Harkness, & Nye, ), the rate increases to around one‐third within cohorts experiencing adversity (Law, Rush, Schoon, & Parsons, ; Ryan, Gibbon, & O'Shea, ).…”
Section: Maternal Responsiveness and Child Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the literature, estimated rates of language difficulties in cohorts of children experiencing adversity have been found to range from 30.5% (ages 3;0-4;11 years) (Ryan, Gibbon, & O'Shea, 2016), to 40% (5;0-12;0 years) (Law et al, 2011) up to 56% (3;0-4;3 years) (Locke, Ginsborg, & Peers, 2002). Moreover, when compared to other child outcomes, language development has been found to be particularly vulnerable to the impact of adversity (Duncan & Brooks-Gunn, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the nature of our sample cohort can affect the difference in SD . A recent study (Ryan, Gibbon, & O'shea, 2016) also found that the profile of superior expressive compared with receptive language is apparent in children with language delay and socioeconomic status (SES) factors such as parent–child interaction styles, level of maternal education, maternal sensitivity, income‐to‐needs ratio, and environmental variables may have a greater influence on receptive rather than expressive language. In addition, some data suggest a tendency for speech and language interventions to be more effective to improve expressive than receptive skills (Law, Garrett, & Nye, 2004)—this may be relevant because all of the children in the present study were receiving speech therapy services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%