1978
DOI: 10.1016/0378-2166(78)90005-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expressive illocutionary acts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
0
9

Year Published

1995
1995
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
77
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Thanking is therefore socially expected on those occasions where the speaker has been done a service by the addressee and its absence may be perceived as markedly rude and socially disruptive, as thanking is a reactive act par excellence (Coulmas 1981in Milà García, 2011). This also explains why parents insist on teaching their offspring to say 'thanks' (Norrick, 1978;Greif and Gleason, 1980). Expectedly enough, thanking appears in both chats in practically the same frequency.…”
Section: Thankingmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thanking is therefore socially expected on those occasions where the speaker has been done a service by the addressee and its absence may be perceived as markedly rude and socially disruptive, as thanking is a reactive act par excellence (Coulmas 1981in Milà García, 2011). This also explains why parents insist on teaching their offspring to say 'thanks' (Norrick, 1978;Greif and Gleason, 1980). Expectedly enough, thanking appears in both chats in practically the same frequency.…”
Section: Thankingmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…there is no match between the words and the world since the speaker is referring to her "inner" world rather than the "external" one. Despite their troublesome nature, there seems to be agreement on the fact that expressives deal with the speaker's "inner" world, as reflected by other definitions which have also focused on the speaker's "underlying emotions" (Norrick, 1978), "state of mind, attitudes and feelings" (Taavitsainen and Jucker, 2010) or their "psychological attitudes" (Guiraud et al, 2011).…”
Section: Defining Expressive Speech Actsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Auramaki, Lehtinen, and Lyytinen, 1988;Button, 1995;Croft, 1994;Fishman, 1971;Holdcroft, 1978;Hymes, 1962;Kearns, 1984;Longacre, 1976;Norrick, 1978;Rodden, 1993;Sadock, 1988;Stubbs, 1983;Tsohatzidis, 1994;Vanderveken, 1990;Verschueren, 1977;Verschueren, 1980;Wastell and White, 1993;Wierzbicka, 1985;Wierzbicka, 1987) The Theory of Speech Acts has been applied, deeply analysed and criticised mainly within the boundaries of linguistic theories. The theory can be applied to natural language, to examine text and discover how the syntax places a Speech Act (SA) in one category.…”
Section: Framework Of Linguistic Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of linguistics, apologies of various types seem always to be studied either as speech acts (e.g., Abadi, 1990;Fillmore, 1971;Olshtain and Cohen, 1983;Olshtain, 1987) or as broader social interactions (e.g., Holmes, 1990;Norrick, 1978;Owen, 1983;Trosborg, 2003). Corporate apologies made after an allegation of wrongdoing or transgression could well be conceived as an independent genre, given that they are one of the most frequent and central crisis-related "activity types" that is "goaldefined, socially constituted, bounded events with constraints on participants, setting, and so on, but above all on the kinds of allowable contributions" (Levinson, 1992(Levinson, [1979: 69, italics original).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%