1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80182-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended proximal femoral osteotomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Three (4%) fractures of the femur occurred during cement removal ( Table 5). Fracture occurring during cement removal or insertion of the implant was B1, according to the Vancouver classification [16]. All the intraoperative fractures were diagnosed with an intraoperative X-ray (AP and lateral) taken immediately after the insertion of the femoral stem (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three (4%) fractures of the femur occurred during cement removal ( Table 5). Fracture occurring during cement removal or insertion of the implant was B1, according to the Vancouver classification [16]. All the intraoperative fractures were diagnosed with an intraoperative X-ray (AP and lateral) taken immediately after the insertion of the femoral stem (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has been shown with femoral component revision, cortical osteotomy provides improved visualization of the canal for cement removal as well as decreased hoop stress at the boneecement interface facilitating prosthesis and cement mantle removal. 26 Limited data are available on the outcomes of these techniques in the shoulder. Sperling and Cofieldl 23 published results from 20 patients who underwent humeral stem revision using cortical windows, with union achieved in 17 of 20, with no evidence of radiographic loosening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through a posterior hip approach, the femoral component was removed via a Paprosky-style extended proximal femoral osteotomy 10. Next, the acetabular cup and supporting screw were removed (Fig.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%