2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended-release naltrexone and drug treatment courts: Policy and evidence for implementing an evidence-based treatment

Abstract: a b s t r a c tWith insufficient access to treatment and a tradition of criminalizing addiction, people with substance use disorders -including opioid dependence -are more likely to be incarcerated than they are to receive the treatment they need. Drug treatment courts aim to address this problem, engaging their participants in substance use treatment in lieu of incarceration. Drug courts offer an especially important window of opportunity to connect opioid-dependent participants to extended-release naltrexone… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, however, there has been slow but notable increase in acceptance of all types of MOUDs in legal settings, but especially for opioid antagonists (i.e., extended release naltrexone) as these medications cannot be abused. [9][10][11] When opioid antagonist treatment is provided to individuals during or soon after release from incarceration, few remain in treatment long-term. 12,13 Understanding the impact of opioid antagonist treatment on one's quality of life may help to explain why few individuals with legal involvement remain in medication treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, however, there has been slow but notable increase in acceptance of all types of MOUDs in legal settings, but especially for opioid antagonists (i.e., extended release naltrexone) as these medications cannot be abused. [9][10][11] When opioid antagonist treatment is provided to individuals during or soon after release from incarceration, few remain in treatment long-term. 12,13 Understanding the impact of opioid antagonist treatment on one's quality of life may help to explain why few individuals with legal involvement remain in medication treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential reasons for sluggish naltrexone uptake has been the subject of several studies. These studies demonstrate that the reasons for the low uptake of naltrexone are varied, complex, and originate from several institutional and individual-level barriers [47][48][49][50][51]. Fundamental to the prompt adoption of any evidence-based practice are policies and procedures that promote accessibility and ease of use [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite efforts to engage opioid-addicted patients on parole and probation in pharmacotherapy, the criminal justice system has had a traditional preference for treatments that do not utilize medications (Bonnie, 2006; Hubbard, Collins, Rachal, & Cavanaugh, 1988). This preference appears to be slowly changing (Robertson & Swartz, 2018), although the extent of the change is presently difficult to quantify.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%