1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1521-3951(199911)216:1<107::aid-pssb107>3.0.co;2-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended Tight-Binding and Thermochemical Modeling of III-Nitride Heterostructures at Any Temperature and Pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(8) for various heterojunctions. Predicted valence band offsets are given in the first column of Table 2 for various interfaces, which are compared with the corresponding values of p-p extended tight binding model (ETB3) [3], model solid theory [9], linear muffin thin orbital model (LMTO) [10], and the first principles electronic structure model (FPES) [11] against the experimental data [2], with excellent agreement. Predicted valence band offsets are given in the first column of Table 2 for various interfaces, which are compared with the corresponding values of p-p extended tight binding model (ETB3) [3], model solid theory [9], linear muffin thin orbital model (LMTO) [10], and the first principles electronic structure model (FPES) [11] against the experimental data [2], with excellent agreement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(8) for various heterojunctions. Predicted valence band offsets are given in the first column of Table 2 for various interfaces, which are compared with the corresponding values of p-p extended tight binding model (ETB3) [3], model solid theory [9], linear muffin thin orbital model (LMTO) [10], and the first principles electronic structure model (FPES) [11] against the experimental data [2], with excellent agreement. Predicted valence band offsets are given in the first column of Table 2 for various interfaces, which are compared with the corresponding values of p-p extended tight binding model (ETB3) [3], model solid theory [9], linear muffin thin orbital model (LMTO) [10], and the first principles electronic structure model (FPES) [11] against the experimental data [2], with excellent agreement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where E g; av ¼ ½E gG þ 4E gL þ 3E gX =8 is the average bandgap, defined as E g; av ¼ E c; av À E v; av , where E c; av ¼ ½E cG þ 4E cL þ 3E cX =8 is the average conduction band and E v; av ¼ E v À D s =3 is the average of the heavy hole, light hole and spin-orbit split-off valence bands and E v is the top of the valence band at the center of the Brillouin zone, obtained by using the p-p tight binding theory [3] or the sp 3 tight binding theory [4]. Since E 0 ¼ ðE a þ E b Þ=2 can be calculated from the tight binding parameters using Eqs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations