1994
DOI: 10.1016/0148-2963(94)90040-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending brands with new product concepts: The role of category attribute congruity, brand affect, and brand breadth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
0
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
65
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of university students in pre-tests is common practice (e.g. Kim et al, 2001;Sheinin & Schmitt, 1994). The procedure for selecting the brands consisted of three steps that were independently performed for each product category.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of university students in pre-tests is common practice (e.g. Kim et al, 2001;Sheinin & Schmitt, 1994). The procedure for selecting the brands consisted of three steps that were independently performed for each product category.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brand breadth captures the extent to which firms use similar brands to cover and market a variety of product types (Boush & Loken, 1991;Scheinin & Schmitt, 1994). Brands can show high breadth when they could be or are associated with several product categories.…”
Section: Brand Strategies: Brand Breadthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to product strategies, we analyze product specialization (intra-industry diversification), intended as the extent to which a firm focuses or not on narrow product categories that target specific sets of customers (Park, Jaworski, & MacInnis, 1986). Concerning brand strategies, we focus on the level of brand breadth, which denotes the extent to which single brands are used to cover and market a variety of product types compared to multiple brands attached to particular products (Boush & Loken, 1991;Scheinin & Schmitt, 1994). Given the existence of trade-offs between market share and market size dynamics, it can be argued that these strategies may affect market share and market size differently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, previous studies on brand extensions relied on two important factors related to the success of brand extension. The first relates to the characteristics of a parent brand, such as perceived quality, wide/narrow brand (brand breadth), and the number of extension (e.g., Bottomley & Doyle, 1996;Broniarcyk & Alba, 1994;Sheinin & Schmitt, 1994). The other is the use of either consumer attitude or market performance as indicators for evaluating the relationship between a parent brand and its extensions (e.g., Aaker & Keller, 1990;Bhat & Reddy, 1997;Chakravarti et al 1990;Sunde & Brodie, 1993).…”
Section: Brand and Brand Extension Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, many researchers measure consumer evaluations of the extension and the core brand in terms of favorability or likeability (e.g. Lane & Jacobsen, 1997;Sheinin & Schmitt, 1994;Smith & Andrews, 1995). Generally, consumers need to possess positive beliefs and favorable attitudes toward the core brand for the extension to be successful.…”
Section: Brand Attitude Toward Brand Portfoliomentioning
confidence: 99%