2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10844-008-0054-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending the rand, adjusted rand and jaccard indices to fuzzy partitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When putting elements independently of each other into clusters, however, this is a possible scenario. And indeed, this scenario contributes to the fuzzy Rand index according to (4) and (6).…”
Section: Campello and Frigui Et Almentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When putting elements independently of each other into clusters, however, this is a possible scenario. And indeed, this scenario contributes to the fuzzy Rand index according to (4) and (6).…”
Section: Campello and Frigui Et Almentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We start with the proposals of Campello [7] and Frigui et al [8], which are intimately connected in the sense that the latter can be seen as a special case of the former. Subsequently, an alternative extension of the Rand index is discussed, namely the one proposed by Brouwer [6], which is based on the idea of a "measure of bonding" between pairs of objects. While this approach is still quite similar to Campello and Frigui et al, the measure put forward by Anderson et al [2] proceeds from a different idea and takes the so-called contingency matrix of two fuzzy partitions as a point of departure.…”
Section: Generalizations Of the Rand Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Esse é o caso do popular índice ARI projetado para APEs. Apenas as medidas 13AGRI e 09BARI (Brouwer, 2009) apresentaram tal avaliação para todos os cená-rios considerados, o que inclui o contexto dos APEs; entretanto, 09BARI não atingiu o máximo 1 para o número correto de grupos na maioria dos cenários do primeiro experimento. As outras medidas exibiram preferência por certas soluções, fenômeno atribuível unicamente aos seus mecanismos de avaliação.…”
Section: Consideraçõesunclassified