2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extension of mepolizumab injection intervals as potential of saving costs in well controlled patients with severe eosinophilic asthma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect is closely related to the mepolizumab-mediated improvement in asthma control. The results of our study are consistent with those of other studies [16][17][18][19][20]. In this study, we found that mepolizumab did not change IgE levels, which is in agreeance with the results of other studies [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This effect is closely related to the mepolizumab-mediated improvement in asthma control. The results of our study are consistent with those of other studies [16][17][18][19][20]. In this study, we found that mepolizumab did not change IgE levels, which is in agreeance with the results of other studies [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Im Fall einer Kontrolle der CRSwNP wäre eine Verlängerung der Biologikaintervalle medizinisch möglich, wird aber wegen der nicht zugelassenen Applikationsintervalle, daher potenziellem Off-Label-Use [ 7 ], nicht empfohlen [ 10 ]. Für das Asthma und die atopische Dermatitis wurde gezeigt, dass eine gute Kontrolle unter der Biologikatherapie mit verlängerten Therapieintervallen erhalten werden kann [ 3 , 4 , 11 ]. Hier stellt sich die Frage, ob die Kontrolle der CRSwNP im Sinne einer weitestgehenden Rückbildung der Polypen und Beschwerden unter Dupilumab erhalten werden kann, wenn die Dupilumab-Intervalle personalisiert auf 4 Wochen, ggf.…”
Section: Empfehlungen Zur Biologikatherapieunclassified
“…Therefore, initial gradual reduction of ICS to the lowest possible ICS dose before discontinuation of LABA is recommended[ 175 ] If the patient is on a combination of ICS and LABA, LTRA, or other controllers; start by tapering ICS to the lowest possible dose (Evidence B). [ 176 177 ] If control is achieved, LTRA may be discontinued first (Evidence D)[ 176 ] For significant oral side effects occur, consider a change in therapy, reduction in the dose or frequency of ICS (if possible), advise vigorous mouth washing after inhalation, use of spacer (concomitant with MDI devices), and/or use of appropriate local antifungal therapy for severe oral thrush[ 178 ] For patients with well-controlled eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab for at least 18 months, extending the dosage intervals gradually between the injections up to 6–8 weeks bears the potential to save costs for the health care system without compromising asthma control[ 179 ] For patients with well-controlled asthma treated with omalizumab for at least 18 months, extending the dosage intervals gradually between the injections up to 3–4 weeks bears the potential to save costs for the health care system without compromising asthma control[ 180 ] Patients should be informed that asthma control may deteriorate if treatment is completely discontinued. [ 174 ] …”
Section: Section 6: Pharmacological Management In Adults and Adolescentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For patients with well-controlled eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab for at least 18 months, extending the dosage intervals gradually between the injections up to 6–8 weeks bears the potential to save costs for the health care system without compromising asthma control[ 179 ]…”
Section: Section 6: Pharmacological Management In Adults and Adolescentsmentioning
confidence: 99%