2006
DOI: 10.1142/s0217751x06031703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extension of the Shirafuji Model for Massive Particles With Spin

Abstract: We extend the Shirafuji model for massless particles with primary spacetime coordinates and composite four-momenta to a model for massive particles with spin and electric charge. The primary variables in the model are the spacetime four-vector, four scalars describing spin and charge degrees of freedom as well as a pair of Weyl spinors. The geometric description proposed in this paper provides an intermediate step between the free purely twistorial model in two-twistor space in which both spacetime and four-mo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, Lagrangian mechanics of a massive spinning particle in M has been successfully formulated in Refs. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] by using two twistors. In the respective formulations, the SU(2) symmetry in two-twistor system is maintained in the action of a massive spinning particle.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, Lagrangian mechanics of a massive spinning particle in M has been successfully formulated in Refs. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] by using two twistors. In the respective formulations, the SU(2) symmetry in two-twistor system is maintained in the action of a massive spinning particle.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long after Penrose, Perjés, and Hughston made their attempts, Lagrangian mechanics of a massive spinning particle in M has been formulated in terms of twistors, and it has been studied until quite recently [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. In almost all these studies [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]17], only the two-twistor description of a massive particle is conventionally adopted without clarifying the reason why the n(≥ 3)-twistor description is not employed. Under such circumstances, Routh and Townsend showed that only the two-twistor formulation can successfully describe a massive particle in M [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18]), as reflected by the non-vanishing of the PB among the spacetime coordinates of the particles with spin; this is also the case when spin is related to the pres-ence of the supersymmetry and the superspace extension of classical mechanics [19,20,21] . We see therefore two options for describing a two-twistor-inspired massive spinning particle dynamics: i) to use the standard Penrose approach with noncommutative Minkowski coordinates satisfying the PB (1.12) [21]. In such a case to complete the description of the quantized theory of particles with non-vanishing spin one is led to a field theoretic framework on noncommutative spacetime [37].…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the twistor approach is used not only for massless states of finite spin. For example, there are twistor formulations of massive particles with fixed spin (see, for example, [34,35,36,37] and references therein) as well as massive particles of higher spins [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%