Czech.Math.J. 2018
DOI: 10.21136/cmj.2018.0338-17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensions of covariantly finite subcategories revisited

Abstract: Institute of Mathematics of the Czech Academy of Sciences provides access to digitized documents strictly for personal use. Each copy of any part of this document must contain these Terms of use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, from Lemma 3.10 and the claim above, it follows that F(Θ) = * t i=1 X . Hence this result follows from [H,Theorem 3.3] and its dual.…”
Section: Filtered Objectsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, from Lemma 3.10 and the claim above, it follows that F(Θ) = * t i=1 X . Hence this result follows from [H,Theorem 3.3] and its dual.…”
Section: Filtered Objectsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The proof we give here uses the extriangulated version of Gentle-Todorov's theorem due to He [H,Theorem 3.3]. More precisely, let (C, E, s) be an extriangulated category with enough projectives, X and Y be two covariantly finite subcategories of C. Then X * Y is a covariantly finite subcategory of C. Theorem 3.11.…”
Section: Therefore We Obtain λmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. By Proposition 3.17(2), X is covariantly finite in C. Since C has enough projectives, it follows from [H,Theorem 3.3] that T 1 * X is covariantly finite in C, and hence it is functorially finite in C. Similarly, we can show that Y * F 2 is functorially finite in C. Hence Ψ is well-defined. This finishes the proof.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 78%