2002
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.2.298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensive feature detection of N-terminal protein sorting signals

Abstract: We have succeeded in finding rules whose prediction accuracies come close to that of TargetP, while still retaining a very simple and interpretable form. We also discuss and interpret the discovered rules.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
499
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 677 publications
(513 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
10
499
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possibility is that they have distinct functions reflected by different spatial and temporal regulation. 71,72 It would be of interest to investigate the spatial and temporal regulation of AtBAG6 paralogues to elucidate their specific molecular functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possibility is that they have distinct functions reflected by different spatial and temporal regulation. 71,72 It would be of interest to investigate the spatial and temporal regulation of AtBAG6 paralogues to elucidate their specific molecular functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial sequences were excluded and the remaining genes were regarded as CRN proteins. Secretion signals of serine peptidases and CRN proteins were identified using three tools (SignalP [34], TargetP [35], and iPSORT [36]) with default settings. The conserved N-terminal profiles were generated using WebLogo http://weblogo.berkeley.edu.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sets of protein sequences encoded in the nuclear genomes of Arabidopsis and rice were analyzed using each of the four predictors iPSORT (Bannai et al, 2002), TargetP (Emanuelsson et al, 2000), PCLR (Schein et al, 2001) and Predotar (http://www.inra.fr/ predotar/). Sensitivity and specificity of cTP predictions were examined by using the 4500 protein test set described above.…”
Section: Identification Of Ctps and Evaluation Of The Accuracy Of Prementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specificity and sensitivity of the four cTP predictors iPSORT (Bannai et al, 2002), TargetP (Emanuelsson et al, 2000), PCLR (Schein et al, 2001) and Predotar (http:// www.inra.fr/predotar/) have been determined based on a test set of 4500 proteins whose subcellular localization has been experimentally determined (see http://www.mpiz-koeln. mpg.de/~leister/chloroplast _ 2.html).…”
Section: Accuracy Of Ctp Predictors and Of Their Combinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation