Volume 12: Wind Energy 2020
DOI: 10.1115/gt2020-16327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensive Validation of HAWT Unsteady Modelling Using BEM and CFD

Abstract: The present work aims to present two different approaches to model the unsteady aerodynamics of horizontal-axis wind turbines (HAWTs). A complete and extensive comparison has been established between the results obtained using a low-fidelity calculation tool, as the Blade Element Momentum (BEM), and a high-fidelity technique, as the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). Regarding the first calculation strategy, an accurate revision in polar diagrams calculation and the implementation of yaw and dynamic stall rou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e matrices are solved by choosing the generalized geometric-algebraic multigrid (GAMG) for pressure and a preconditioned biconjugated gradient (PBiCG) for velocity [20]. e details of BEM and CFD data that are used in this paper for comparison are described in references [22,23].…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e matrices are solved by choosing the generalized geometric-algebraic multigrid (GAMG) for pressure and a preconditioned biconjugated gradient (PBiCG) for velocity [20]. e details of BEM and CFD data that are used in this paper for comparison are described in references [22,23].…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 10, the aerodynamic torque calculated using the current ALM code is compared with UBEM and CFD results, the details of which are available in [22,23]. Data are presented for different wind speeds of 10 m/s, 13 m/s, and 15 m/s corresponding to TSR equal to 3.8, 2.9, and 2.5, respectively.…”
Section: Mathematical Problems In Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%