2002
DOI: 10.1080/714000257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External-Internal Linkages in Democratization: Developing an Open Model of Democratic Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…IOs promote democracy by altering elites’ incentives to comply with or maintain democratic institutions (Donno, 2013; Pevehouse, 2005; Poast & Urpelainen, 2018), or by providing technical assistance to leaders in new democracies (Poast & Urpelainen, 2018). Authors that approach this topic primarily from the domestic point of view also emphasize the importance of domestic elites, and especially executives, as the critical intermediaries or “gatekeepers” between international actors and states (Moravcsik, 1994; Tolstrup, 2013; Yilmaz, 2002). As such, IO membership can increase executive power relative to other domestic institutions.…”
Section: Linking Ios and Democratic Backslidingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IOs promote democracy by altering elites’ incentives to comply with or maintain democratic institutions (Donno, 2013; Pevehouse, 2005; Poast & Urpelainen, 2018), or by providing technical assistance to leaders in new democracies (Poast & Urpelainen, 2018). Authors that approach this topic primarily from the domestic point of view also emphasize the importance of domestic elites, and especially executives, as the critical intermediaries or “gatekeepers” between international actors and states (Moravcsik, 1994; Tolstrup, 2013; Yilmaz, 2002). As such, IO membership can increase executive power relative to other domestic institutions.…”
Section: Linking Ios and Democratic Backslidingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dans les années 1980, les chercheurs soutenaient que les transitions découlaient plus de variables internes, donnant en revanche un rôle marginal au contexte international (Diamond & Linz, 1989). Plus tard, les chercheurs ont commencé à émettre l'hypothèse que les transitions démocratiques devaient être analysées en fonction de variables d'ordre plus global (Levitsky & Way, 2010;Mainwaring & Pérez-Liñán, 2013;Pevehouse, 2005;Whitehead, 1996;Yilmaz, 2002). Selon ces chercheurs, expliquer la transition vers la démocratie par les efforts du national fournit un portrait tronqué du processus.…”
Section: Notesunclassified
“…They encourage their friends in those democracies whose governments have some diplomatic leverage to lobby for international pressure to be put on their own regime. In consequence undemocratic regimes that are sensitive to their international legitimacy see the incentive structure changing: they respond not by raising the levels of repression but by increasing the political space in which pro-democracy activists can press their case (Yilmaz, 2002). Belonging to one of the political party internationals may be a starting point for the domestic opposition to have access to international channels in this way.…”
Section: Globalisation Shifts the Power Imbalance In Autocraciesmentioning
confidence: 99%