2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External Ventricular Drainage Preceding the Removal of a Nail from the Intracranial Space as a Safe Management Strategy for Predicted Secondary Intraventricular Hemorrhage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two review articles summarized 83 unique cases that were treated from 1959 to 2010 [14,15]. A PubMed search using the terms nail gun and penetrating head injury identified an additional 16 cases published from 2010 to 2017 [2][3][4]8,[10][11][12][13][16][17][18]. Low-velocity penetrations, such as nail-gun PHIs, are considered less likely to produce focal neurological deficits than high-velocity penetrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two review articles summarized 83 unique cases that were treated from 1959 to 2010 [14,15]. A PubMed search using the terms nail gun and penetrating head injury identified an additional 16 cases published from 2010 to 2017 [2][3][4]8,[10][11][12][13][16][17][18]. Low-velocity penetrations, such as nail-gun PHIs, are considered less likely to produce focal neurological deficits than high-velocity penetrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the subset of nail-gun injuries that are intracranial account for fewer than 0.1% of all reported nail-gun injuries. Although intracranial nail-gun injuries have typically been characterized as the result of accidental or workplaceassociated trauma [3,7,8], recent reports reflect an increase in intentional self-inflicted injuries [8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The needle core was retracted when bloody cerebrospinal fluid flowed out, and the drainage catheter was advanced another 1–2 cm. The scalp was then sutured, and the internal drainage tube was fixed and connected to the external drainage tube 5. After the surgery, the drainage tube was elevated and placed 10–15 cm above the level of external auditory canals, and drainage was maintained unobstructed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%