2019
DOI: 10.1007/s41109-019-0131-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extinction-induced community reorganization in bipartite networks

Abstract: We study how the community structure of bipartite mutualistic networks changes in a dynamic context. First, we consider a real mutualistic network and introduce extinction events according to several scenarios. We model extinctions as node or interaction removals. For node removal, we consider random, directed and sequential extinctions; for interaction removal, we consider random extinctions. The bipartite network reorganizes showing an increase of the effective modularity and a fast decrease of the persisten… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To test the robustness of a network, a node can be removed or altered to affect the network structure (Barnes et al 2016). Generally, the removal of the most connected species, hubs, causes more secondary extinctions than a random species (Sheykhali et al 2019). However, when the system returns to the original state after a perturbation the network is considered resilient (Mandakovic et al 2018).…”
Section: Biomonitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test the robustness of a network, a node can be removed or altered to affect the network structure (Barnes et al 2016). Generally, the removal of the most connected species, hubs, causes more secondary extinctions than a random species (Sheykhali et al 2019). However, when the system returns to the original state after a perturbation the network is considered resilient (Mandakovic et al 2018).…”
Section: Biomonitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2018 ; Sheykhali et al. 2019 ), or antagonistic such as in host-parasitoid (Cagnolo et al. 2010 ; Morris et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the mutualistic context, species should not be considered in isolation, as they participate in a complex of interactions (Bascompte & Jordano, 2014). Individuals depend upon each other for resources and processes, such as dispersal and reproduction, to the point that the loss of single species may drive not just co‐extinctions (Colwell et al, 2012) but also pervasive effects on the community stability (Campbell et al, 2012; Sheikhali et al, 2019), and even ecosystem functions derived from that loss (Rogers et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interacting actors forming a web‐like architecture can be explored by the network approach (Bascompte & Jordano, 2014). The description of plant–animal interactions through networks disentangles how species are organized within populations and communities, and inferences can be made about individual roles, heterogeneity in specificity degrees (Bascompte & Jordano, 2007; Dormann et al, 2017) and, ultimately, the consequences of the loss of functions (Sheikhali et al, 2019; Vieira & Almeida‐Neto, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%