Despite many studies on the possible role of inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate (IP 4 ) 1 in cellular physiology, its function remains unclear and indeed there is still some debate over whether it has a function at all (1, 2). Formed by direct phosphorylation of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP 3 ), a reaction catalyzed by a family of Ca 2ϩ -regulated IP 3 3-kinases (1, 3), IP 4 has been linked to a potential role in the regulation of intracellular free Ca 2ϩ concentration ([Ca 2ϩ ] i ) following cellular stimulation with agonists that activate phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C (4 -7). Evidence for this finding has come from a number of sources. For example, in endothelial cells, there is direct evidence (8) and, in neurons, there is direct (9) and indirect evidence (10) that IP 4 can activate Ca 2ϩ influx channels in the plasma membrane. Furthermore, one of the first effects of IP 4 to be reported highlighted an ability of this compound to synergize with IP 3 to mobilize Ca 2ϩ and regulate subsequent store-operated Ca 2ϩ influx (11-13). However, the marked sensitivity of this particular system to experimental protocols (11, 14 -16) has also raised a significant degree of controversy over the role of IP 4 in intracellular Ca 2ϩ homeostasis. In recent years, we have taken the view that if IP 4 does indeed constitute a novel second messenger, one criterion that must be fulfilled is the presence within cells of protein(s) that specifically bind IP 4 , i.e. an IP 4 receptor. To this end, we have described the purification (17, 18) and cloning (19) of a highly specific IP 4 -binding protein termed GAP1IP4BP . This protein, which functions as a GTPase-activating protein for members of the Ras-like family of small GTPases, at present constitutes the most promising candidate IP 4 receptor.The Ras-like family includes H-Ras, N-Ras, and K-Ras4A and 4B, the R-Ras proteins, the Ral proteins, and the Rap proteins 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B (20 -22). These are ubiquitously expressed, evolutionarily conserved proteins that couple extracellular signals to various cellular responses (20 -22). All of these proteins have the inherent ability to undergo conformational changes in response to the alternate binding of GDP and GTP. The GDP-bound "off" state and the GTP-bound "on" state recognize distinct effector proteins, thereby allowing these proteins to function as two-state molecular "switches." Importantly, cycling between the two forms does not occur spontaneously. Activation requires guanine nucleotide exchange factors to induce the dissociation of GDP to allow association of the more abundant GTP, and deactivation requires GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) to bind to the GTP-bound form to enhance the rate of intrinsic GTPase activity (20 -22). GAP1 IP4BP along with the related proteins GAP1 m , RASAL, and CAPRI (23-30) is composed of tandem N-terminal C 2 domains, a C-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain adjacent to a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (Btk) motif, and a central catalytic Ras GAP-related domain. Associated with th...