2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracorporeal life support in the emergency department: A narrative review for the emergency physician

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
43
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that emergency physicians provide the first medical contact in all critical patients, including those with cardiac arrest, prompt patient selection and ECMO initiation by emergency physicians might improve survival rates. This suggestion aligns with a recently published review [17], where the authors stated that ECMO may be a useful tool in the hands of emergency physicians when a life-threatening situation is present. Furthermore, well-established ED ECMO programs for OHCA patients exist in the literature [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Considering that emergency physicians provide the first medical contact in all critical patients, including those with cardiac arrest, prompt patient selection and ECMO initiation by emergency physicians might improve survival rates. This suggestion aligns with a recently published review [17], where the authors stated that ECMO may be a useful tool in the hands of emergency physicians when a life-threatening situation is present. Furthermore, well-established ED ECMO programs for OHCA patients exist in the literature [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…17,18 The fact that CA is unwitnessed is considered as a contraindication to ECPR. 19,20 Unwitnessed cardiac arrest patients are, therefore, often deemed ineligible for ECPR clinical protocols when the no-flow duration is unknown. [19][20][21] The duration of CPR corresponding to a low-flow prolonged to the extent that brain recovery is doubtful (about 60-80 min), is also considered as a contraindication to ECPR.…”
Section: Overall Survival Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21] The duration of CPR corresponding to a low-flow prolonged to the extent that brain recovery is doubtful (about 60-80 min), is also considered as a contraindication to ECPR. [19][20][21][22] The median low-flow duration of 105 minutes for neurologically intact survivors in our study is much longer than median CPR durations of normothermic CA patients undergoing ECPR. 23 These figures suggest that the criteria to qualify normothermic CA patients for ECPR do not apply in the same way for hypothermic CA.…”
Section: Overall Survival Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important factors that influences outcomes in ECPR cases is the time from arrest to initiation of ECMO flow . POCUS with RESCUE‐TEE has been shown to improve resuscitation quality and efficiency of initiating ECPR (early flow time) which is associated with improved ECPR survival rates …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%