“…The high abundance of (7 R)-(+)-Lyoniresinol 9 -glucoside, cnicin, methyisocitric acid, chrysoeriol 4 ,7-diglucoronide, and 3-isopropylmalatte in the aqueous extract and D-leucic acid, dodecanedioc acid, quercetin-3-(2 ,3 ,4 -triacetylgalactoside), sebacic acid, and pcoumaroyl malic acid in the ethanolic extract and vice versa could be attributed to the degree of polarity of the extracting medium [55] and may explain or buttress the variation (46.8%) in the types and amounts of phytoconstituents (generally) as identified based on UPLC-MS analysis. While the use of this technique is adequate and reliable, as buttressed in the work of Fougre et al [56], adopting a related tool, the high abundance of phytoconstituents, namely, azealic acid, isowertin 2 -rhamnoside, D-2-hydrozyglutaric acid, citraconic acid, 3-p-courmaroylquinic acid, cis-aconitic acid, UNPD129404, caffeic acid ethyl ester, and myricitrin, particularly in the raw CS sample, may be suggested to contribute to the pharmacological attributes (glucose lowering) of CS, since the concentration of bioactive ingredients within a medicinal sample is well-established to influence the pharmacological effectiveness.…”