2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting blinks from continuous eye-tracking data in a mind wandering paradigm

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blink behaviour was often used to indicate internal and external attentional focus. Blinking interrupts visual input, temporarily inhibits visual processing, and is reduced when the task requires processing external visual information [ 43 , 44 , 45 ]. Wide eyes are associated with experimental tasks of this type, whereas browsing tasks are external tasks requiring frequent sweeping of one’s surroundings [ 46 , 47 ].…”
Section: Statistical Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blink behaviour was often used to indicate internal and external attentional focus. Blinking interrupts visual input, temporarily inhibits visual processing, and is reduced when the task requires processing external visual information [ 43 , 44 , 45 ]. Wide eyes are associated with experimental tasks of this type, whereas browsing tasks are external tasks requiring frequent sweeping of one’s surroundings [ 46 , 47 ].…”
Section: Statistical Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for mind wandering detection, the conventional view on the detrimental impact of ocular artifacts is shifting. Several studies have identified correlations between mind wandering and fixation 44 and blinks 45 , 46 . Consequently, including ocular ‘artifacts’ in the EEG signal may enhance decoding performance 19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we excluded every recording during which the participant closed his/her eyes for a duration longer than 10% of the total clip duration to avoid watching, as blinking causes around 5–10% data loss during a recording [ 48 ]. Additionally, we considered faulty recordings those in which participants’ attention was decoupled from the screen stimuli (mind-wandering phenomenon) for a length greater than 20% of the overall duration of the corresponding video clip [ 49 ]. The 20% cutoff was selected based on the evidence provided by a range of studies indicating that mind wandering occurs at least 20% and up to 50% of the time, even during tasks that are not designed to induce it [ 50 , 51 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%