2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2007.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting interactions between proteins from the literature

Abstract: During the last decade, biomedicine has witnessed a tremendous development. Large amounts of experimental and computational biomedical data have been generated along with new discoveries, which are accompanied by an exponential increase in the number of biomedical publications describing these discoveries. In the meantime, there has been a great interest with scientific communities in text mining tools to find knowledge such as protein-protein interactions, which is most relevant and useful for specific analys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is risky to draw conclusions on the performance of the different techniques. In general terms, the linguistic-based approaches perform well for capturing relatively simple binary relationships between entities in a sentence, but fail to extract more complex relationships expressed in various coordinate and relational clauses [30]. We believe that the performance of linguisticbased approaches is strongly influenced by the shortage of biomedical parsers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is risky to draw conclusions on the performance of the different techniques. In general terms, the linguistic-based approaches perform well for capturing relatively simple binary relationships between entities in a sentence, but fail to extract more complex relationships expressed in various coordinate and relational clauses [30]. We believe that the performance of linguisticbased approaches is strongly influenced by the shortage of biomedical parsers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linguistic phenomena including negation, modality and mood, which can alter or even reverse the meaning of the sentence, have hardly ever been studied by the pattern-based approaches. Thus, pattern-based approaches are not able to correctly process anything other than short and straightforward sentences [30], which, on the other hand, are quite rare in biomedical texts.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important tasks that need to be solved are (a) recognition of gene and protein names (named entity recognition, NER), (b) recognition of functional information, and (c) recognition of the relationship between biological entities (such as protein-protein interaction or gene-gene regulation) [7]. For each of these steps, various algorithms have been proposed and implemented (see [14] or [18] for surveys). Their performance differs largely depending on the particular task at hand.…”
Section: Problem Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, 'activate' and 'interact' are two common relation terms that connect molecule entities. This technique has been applied to protein-protein interactions (Blaschke et al, 1999;Koike and Takagi , 2005;Zhou and He, 2008), pathway networks (McDonald et al, 2004) and drug interactions (Tari et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%