2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.11.04.467227
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting multi-way chromatin contacts from Hi-C data

Abstract: There is a growing realization that multi-way chromatin contacts formed in chromosome structures are fundamental units of gene regulation. However, due to the paucity and complexity of such contacts, it is challenging to detect and identify them using experiments. Based on an assumption that chromosome structures can be mapped onto a network of Gaussian polymer, here we derive analytic expressions for n-body contact probabilities (n > 2) among chromatin loci based on pairwise genomic contact frequencies ava… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We repeated our analysis for these experimental data using the three-point contact frequency prediction recently proposed by Liu et al [19]. Their method is based on inferring a set of spring constants from Hi-C data, and is hence computationally more complex than the independent link or independent loop approximations, which calculate a set of three-point contact frequencies with optimal N 3 scaling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We repeated our analysis for these experimental data using the three-point contact frequency prediction recently proposed by Liu et al [19]. Their method is based on inferring a set of spring constants from Hi-C data, and is hence computationally more complex than the independent link or independent loop approximations, which calculate a set of three-point contact frequencies with optimal N 3 scaling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…chromosome conformation changes during the cell cycle). Recent studies have proposed a range of statistical approaches to predict contact conformation frequencies based on pairwise contact frequencies [14, 18, 8, 19]. However, these prediction schemes still lack theoretical motivation, and their performance has not been thoroughly compared or tested.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that clinical samples are often limited in number and given in a sectioned form, GAM can be more practical than other methods when studying disease-related genome reorganization. While not easily accessible in Hi-C, a number of important properties of 3D genome, such as higher-order chromatin contact (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21), lamin and nuclear body association (22)(23)(24)(25)(26), can be measured by leveraging cryoFISH-combined GAM. From an ensemble of cells, Hi-C measures the cross-linking frequencies between two genomic loci; GAM measures the co-segregation frequencies in a nuclear profile; FISH measures the inter-locus spatial distances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building a more complete set of principles requires an understanding of multi-way, rather than only pairwise interactions. Recent methods for analyzing Hi-C data have inferred multi-way interactions from pairwise interactions [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9], though with the limitation of some ambiguity inherent to artificial assembly of pairwise ligation junctions or machine learning-based predictions. A recent extension of Hi-C preserves multi-way interactions and uses sequencing of long reads (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-way contacts have been identified using targeted 3C-based methods [4, 5, 6], through inference from pairwise contacts [7], and on occasion using classical Hi-C [8]. Ligation-free approaches, such as GAM and SPRITE, have recently enabled large scale capture of multi-way interactions [9, 10, 11], though comparisons of different methods find under- and over-representation of higher order contacts in the absence of proximity ligation [12, 13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%