2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting nonstationary features for process data analytics and application in fouling detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The more advanced methods use a model to predict clean conditions or subtract variations caused by changes in operation, i. e. variations not caused by fouling. These models can either be physical, based on knowledge of the system (white box), or data-driven (black box) (Kwak et al 2020). The latter have gained especial attention in the past years due to the large interest in machine learning (e. g. neural network models), but also thanks to progress in the field of statistics (e. g. canonical correlation analysis and co-integration analysis), often in combination with methods from control systems engineering (e. g. Kalman filtering and fuzzy logic) (Chen et al 2016, Garcia 2012, Kwak et al 2020, Lalot and Lecoeuche 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more advanced methods use a model to predict clean conditions or subtract variations caused by changes in operation, i. e. variations not caused by fouling. These models can either be physical, based on knowledge of the system (white box), or data-driven (black box) (Kwak et al 2020). The latter have gained especial attention in the past years due to the large interest in machine learning (e. g. neural network models), but also thanks to progress in the field of statistics (e. g. canonical correlation analysis and co-integration analysis), often in combination with methods from control systems engineering (e. g. Kalman filtering and fuzzy logic) (Chen et al 2016, Garcia 2012, Kwak et al 2020, Lalot and Lecoeuche 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In SPA, statistical measures of process variables (mean, variance, autocorrelation, cross-correlation, among others) are selected as input variables for the modeling techniques (typically, PCA), which in many cases improves detection and diagnosis performance. Recent research on variable selection includes: the application of a criteria based on mutual information for variable selection [575]; an efficient technique based on sequential analysis of fault contributions [576]; a technique to extract non-stationary variables and its application to fouling detection [577]; the integration of variable selection methods with moving window techniques for multimodal monitoring, achieving good results on a particularly challenging fault in the TEP benchmark [578]; a comparison of shallow and deep learning methods for selecting variables in an industrial test platform focused on big data and Internet of Things concepts [579]; and the application of causality-based methods for feature selection in the TEP benchmark and in an oil platform fiscal metering plant [580]. Peres and Fogliatto [4] published a review on this subject, highlighting that the most used methods are LASSO regression, the genetic algorithm and regression by direct selection (forward selection).…”
Section: Exploration Characterization and Treatment Of Process Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to dynamic characteristics, certain process variables display nonstationary trends due to various other factors, such as equipment aging, catalyst consumption, and different operating modes [121]. The means and variances of process measurements are time-varying, which challenges the assumption that the measured processes of traditional multivariate statistical methods are stationary [122].…”
Section: Nonstationary Process Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%