2022
DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2021.0195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting stochastic governing laws by non-local Kramers–Moyal formulae

Abstract: With the rapid development of computational techniques and scientific tools, great progress of data-driven analysis has been made to extract governing laws of dynamical systems from data. Despite the wide occurrences of non-Gaussian fluctuations, the effective data-driven methods to identify stochastic differential equations with non-Gaussian Lévy noise are relatively few so far. In this work, we propose a data-driven approach to extract stochastic governing laws with both (Gaussian) Brownian motion and (non-G… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lu et al . [ 192 ] present a new data-driven approach to extract stochastic governing laws with both (Gaussian) Brownian motion and (non-Gaussian) Lévy motion from short bursts of simulation data. The normalizing flow technique is used to estimate the transition probability density function from data and approximate Lévy jump measure, drift coefficient and diffusion coefficient of a stochastic differential equation using non-local Kramers–Moyal formulae.…”
Section: The General Content Of the Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lu et al . [ 192 ] present a new data-driven approach to extract stochastic governing laws with both (Gaussian) Brownian motion and (non-Gaussian) Lévy motion from short bursts of simulation data. The normalizing flow technique is used to estimate the transition probability density function from data and approximate Lévy jump measure, drift coefficient and diffusion coefficient of a stochastic differential equation using non-local Kramers–Moyal formulae.…”
Section: The General Content Of the Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then we can learn the components of the vector field b 3 (x) = Ψ(x)c 3 and b 4 (x) = Ψ(x)c 4 with the coefficients c 3 =[−0.0018, −0.0054, 0.0266, −0.0183, 0.0019, 0.0061, −0.0020, − 0.0677, 0.0025, 0, −0.0029, 0.0079, 0, 0.0025, 0.0029, 0, 0.0190, −0.0024, 0, 0.0021], c 4 =[−0.1559, 0.0134, 0.3722, 0, −0.0316, 0.0039, −0.0018, −0.3626, − 0.0097, 0.0391, 0.0159, 0.0018, 0.0010, −0.0030, 0.0022, 0, 0.1232, 0.0024, −0.0295, 0.0012]. (17) The paths integrated by the learned and true model are compared in Figure 2. It is seen that the results also agree well except more data information, which implies that the algorithm is very robust against environmental noise.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then Li and Duan [13,14] made further investigation to propose nonlocal Kramers-Moyal formulas and accordingly devised a novel data-driven method to extract stochastic dynamical systems with (Gaussian) Brownian motion and (non-Gaussian) Lévy motion from sample path data. Additionally, there are also some data-driven methods based on neural networks to learn dynamical models from time-series data [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For non-Gaussian stochastic differential equations, modifications of the traditional Kramers–Moyal expansion have also been proposed. 40,41 In ref. 42 the authors proposed a stochastic physics-informed neural network framework (SPINN) that minimizes the distance between the predicted moments of the network (drift and diffusivity) from moments computed with Kramers–Moyal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%