2002
DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/15/4/321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting the utmost from the high performance of Sm–Ba–Cu–O bulk superconductors by pulse field magnetization

Abstract: We have studied the magnetization of a melt-processed Sm–Ba–Cu–O bulk superconductor by magnetic pulses at 77 K. The amount of trapped magnetic flux (ΦT) as a function of the pulse amplitude exhibited a peak, which is attributable to the heating of the sample caused by the fast motion of flux lines in the presence of resistive forces. The peak value of ΦT was about half the amount of magnetic flux that was trapped when the sample was field cooled to 77 K, where the field-cooling (FC) value corresponds to the f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The world record using PFM, using a modified multipulse, stepwise-cooling (MMPSC) technique, is only 5.2 Tesla at 29 K [18], which is much less than the true capability of these materials as indicated above. It should be noted that at higher operating temperatures (closer to T c , such as 77 K), fields have been trapped close to that of FC [7,[19][20][21][22]. So-called "giant flux leaps" have been observed by a number of research groups investigating PFM [7,18,[23][24][25][26], and more recently in unpublished experiments carried out in our own research group, where flux jumps occur in the superconductor, and magnetic flux suddenly intrudes into the centre of the superconductor, resulting in a large increase in the measured trapped field at the centre of the top surface of the bulk sample and full magnetization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The world record using PFM, using a modified multipulse, stepwise-cooling (MMPSC) technique, is only 5.2 Tesla at 29 K [18], which is much less than the true capability of these materials as indicated above. It should be noted that at higher operating temperatures (closer to T c , such as 77 K), fields have been trapped close to that of FC [7,[19][20][21][22]. So-called "giant flux leaps" have been observed by a number of research groups investigating PFM [7,18,[23][24][25][26], and more recently in unpublished experiments carried out in our own research group, where flux jumps occur in the superconductor, and magnetic flux suddenly intrudes into the centre of the superconductor, resulting in a large increase in the measured trapped field at the centre of the top surface of the bulk sample and full magnetization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a ferromagnetic yoke has been inserted in the magnetizing fixture to increase the trapped magnetic field [12,13], in which permendur (50Fe+50Co alloy) and soft iron were used experimentally as a yoke material. We have also achieved a trapped field of over 3 T at 40 K on Gd-Ba-Cu-O disk bulk by PFM, employing a split coil with a pair of soft iron yokes [14], in which a symmetric trapped field profile can be also realized [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most significantly, the difference in the trapped field with the FC method tends to escalate when the ability of trapping flux lines increases by improving the material characteristic or by decreasing the temperature. Therefore, many efforts have been devoted to overcome this problem and to increase the trapped field by the PFM method [7][8][9][10][11]. Fujishiro et al have achieved a record high trapped field of 5.2 T by PFM for a 46 mm diameter Gd-Ba-Cu-O bulk superconductor that was cooled by a cryogenic refrigerator, which is however still lower than the trapped field achieved by FC magnetization [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%