2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction and ICP-OES determination of heavy metals using tetrabutylammonium bromide aqueous biphasic system and oleophilic collector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is very important to detect and quantify these ions efficiently, sensitively and quickly by environmental monitoring. Several methods have been developed for the detection of heavy metals in water, including atomic absorption spectrometry [ 3 ], atomic emission spectrometry [ 4 ], X-ray fluorescence spectrometry [ 5 ], mass spectrometry [ 6 ], UV–vis spectroscopy [ 7 ], electrochemical methods [ 8 ], and laser-induced breakdown spectrometry [ 9 , 10 ]. These techniques have a good detection range and have been proven to provide accurate results; however, they have some shortcomings, such as expensive instruments, relatively complex operation, inconvenient execution, and the difficult analysis of a large number of samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is very important to detect and quantify these ions efficiently, sensitively and quickly by environmental monitoring. Several methods have been developed for the detection of heavy metals in water, including atomic absorption spectrometry [ 3 ], atomic emission spectrometry [ 4 ], X-ray fluorescence spectrometry [ 5 ], mass spectrometry [ 6 ], UV–vis spectroscopy [ 7 ], electrochemical methods [ 8 ], and laser-induced breakdown spectrometry [ 9 , 10 ]. These techniques have a good detection range and have been proven to provide accurate results; however, they have some shortcomings, such as expensive instruments, relatively complex operation, inconvenient execution, and the difficult analysis of a large number of samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitive and simultaneous analysis of elements in aqueous samples is of increasing interest in environmental pollution monitoring and drinking water quality control, especially fast and field analytical methods. Compared with the traditional analytical techniques such as inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), and atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is a more facile strategy to conduct field analysis of elements in target samples. For the application of LIBS in liquid analysis, improvement of sensitivity is always one of the hottest topics .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional and classic detection methods of heavy metal cadmium, such as atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), atomic fluorescence spectroscopy (AFS), inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF), and laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], have been well applied in the analysis of cadmium. These detection methods possess many advantages such as good accuracy, high sensitivity, low detection limit, and wide detection range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%