1966
DOI: 10.1021/i260018a019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction for Different Geometries. Constant Diffusivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the conversion time from minutes to seconds, the calculated diffusion coefficients differed from 8 × 10 −8 cm 2 s −1 (smaller particles) to 1 × 10 −8 cm 2 s −1 (for the large particles) in both cases (rapeseeds and soybeans). Obtained results were in agreement with literature data [38,39].…”
Section: Analysis Of Solvent Extraction Data: "Solution Extraction" Osupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…After the conversion time from minutes to seconds, the calculated diffusion coefficients differed from 8 × 10 −8 cm 2 s −1 (smaller particles) to 1 × 10 −8 cm 2 s −1 (for the large particles) in both cases (rapeseeds and soybeans). Obtained results were in agreement with literature data [38,39].…”
Section: Analysis Of Solvent Extraction Data: "Solution Extraction" Osupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Genesis of ground tissues disruptions allowed intracellular miscella to diffuse in order to form external miscella transportable via capillaries [18][19][20][21]. "Diffusion extraction" process was slow and could explain the flat part of extraction curve [38,39]. The solution of diffusion equation and Fourier heat equation was analogous.…”
Section: Analysis Of Solvent Extraction Data: "Solution Extraction" Omentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The diffusivity values obtained by us were similar to those obtained in literature for oil diffusivity in different solvents, considering no external resistance to mass transfer and similar sizes. We can find diffusivity values in literature around 2 · 10 À10 for 0.32-0.95 cm soybean pellets in trichloroethylene (Chorny & Krasuk, 1966), between 3.2 · 10 À9 and 8 · 10 À9 for 0.2-0.4 mm peanut slices in hexane (Fan, Morris, & Wakeham, 1948).…”
Section: Kinetic Datamentioning
confidence: 54%