2011
DOI: 10.1134/s1070427211040306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction of heavy metals from galvanic sludges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…46 In the present study, the order of effectiveness of extraction by EDTA was Zn > Cu > Ni > Cr ≥ Fe, with the high removal efficiency of Zn and Cu possibly due to their strong complexing tendency with EDTA. As stated by Buzaeva et al 41 , for the majority of ligands, the stability of metal complexes decreases in the sequence Cu > Ni > Zn > Cr, which tends to agree with our results. Also, Gong etal.…”
Section: Extraction With Organic Acids Molasses Hydrolysatesupporting
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…46 In the present study, the order of effectiveness of extraction by EDTA was Zn > Cu > Ni > Cr ≥ Fe, with the high removal efficiency of Zn and Cu possibly due to their strong complexing tendency with EDTA. As stated by Buzaeva et al 41 , for the majority of ligands, the stability of metal complexes decreases in the sequence Cu > Ni > Zn > Cr, which tends to agree with our results. Also, Gong etal.…”
Section: Extraction With Organic Acids Molasses Hydrolysatesupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Thus zinc had the highest removal, while iron and chromium were the most difficult metals to extract with EDTA. These results compare with previous studies of Buzaeva et al 41 who also reported the lowest EDTA removal for chromium.…”
Section: Metal Content Of the Sludgesupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations