1990
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1101(90)90184-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction of MOSFET carrier mobility characteristics and calibration of a mobility model for numerical device simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, traditional methods [2], [4] entail an extrapolation of the drain current characteristics at low drain-source potential, to a "threshold" voltage whose definition is neither well defined nor unique [8], thereby resulting in various inconsistencies. These, and other, derivative methods [14]- [17], have thus left unresolved the physical origins of the "universality" of mobility curves, among various related observations. The method implemented below sidesteps such inaccuracies and inconsistencies as incurred by the latter methods, by setting forth the objective criterion (D2 ≈ D3 ≈ 0) for determining the mean electric field E*T across the inversion layer from measurements of ψ*.…”
Section: An Accurate Methods For Measuring the Mean Potential (ψ*) An...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, traditional methods [2], [4] entail an extrapolation of the drain current characteristics at low drain-source potential, to a "threshold" voltage whose definition is neither well defined nor unique [8], thereby resulting in various inconsistencies. These, and other, derivative methods [14]- [17], have thus left unresolved the physical origins of the "universality" of mobility curves, among various related observations. The method implemented below sidesteps such inaccuracies and inconsistencies as incurred by the latter methods, by setting forth the objective criterion (D2 ≈ D3 ≈ 0) for determining the mean electric field E*T across the inversion layer from measurements of ψ*.…”
Section: An Accurate Methods For Measuring the Mean Potential (ψ*) An...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a given value of ID, µ eff is then the only unknown quantity in (23), which is thereby deduced readily from standard measurements. We note that, as simplification (a) above sets µ eff (E*T) = µ eff in (23), the value of E*T corresponding to a given ID, which is essential to the determination of the function µ eff (E*T), is variously assumed to be an "average" [2], or an "effective" [2], [4], [14], value [14], η = 1/3 for holes [4], with Qi (corrected [17]), and Qb, the total inversion and bulk charges, respectively.…”
Section: Conductivity Mobility and The Charge Sheet Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equating the inversion charge of the sheet model, Qi(ψs) per (6), to that posited by (10) and by the Stern-Howard model, for an inversion layer of finite extent z max ≈ (3/𝛽) (see Appendix): For 0 ≤ m(E*T) ≤ 1, the parameter η is thus expected to vary continuously between (1/2) and (1/3), per (8), as observed for standard devices with <100> surfaces, and predictably as a function of inversion level (see Fig. 3).…”
Section: B Determining the Mean Transverse Electric Field E*t Across ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drain-to-source voltage (VDs) is assumed to be small an~ the spatial variation of the local normal electric field, mobility, and electron density is assumed to be small in the horizontal (x) direction. Since the distributions of local electric field and free charge carriers in the inversion layer are very nonlinear, Eef I is then determined using the following definition [23] (24]:…”
Section: µEf F Andmentioning
confidence: 99%