2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2008.00461.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extrahepatic transplant sites for islet xenotransplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biomaterial-based approaches have traditionally involved encapsulation and isolation; however, some scaffolds have been developed that encourage host integration [17, 22, 23]. A biomaterial scaffold can provide a support that enables transplantation at extrahepatic and extravascular sites, which will avoid the negative influences of the liver environment and the IBMIR [24, 25]. Importantly, biomaterial scaffolds implanted extrahepatically may be retrievable, which could facilitate the adoption of insulin-producing cells derived from stem cells.…”
Section: Engraftmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomaterial-based approaches have traditionally involved encapsulation and isolation; however, some scaffolds have been developed that encourage host integration [17, 22, 23]. A biomaterial scaffold can provide a support that enables transplantation at extrahepatic and extravascular sites, which will avoid the negative influences of the liver environment and the IBMIR [24, 25]. Importantly, biomaterial scaffolds implanted extrahepatically may be retrievable, which could facilitate the adoption of insulin-producing cells derived from stem cells.…”
Section: Engraftmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hepatic and intravascular site of islet transplantation has been identified as contributing to poor islet survival posttransplant due to the immediate damage caused by the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction (IBMIR) that occurs when islets encounter whole blood and a foreign hepatic environment that provides additional challenges to engraftment and long-term survival (3,23). Extrahepatic and extravascular sites have been challenging because of the need for creating space to accommodate the relatively large mass of donor cells required while facilitating survival and function (8,17,30). Biomaterial scaffolds provide an opportunity to define an extrahepatic site beyond a surgical pouch and enhance the site for maximal islet engraftment, survival, and function, significantly improving the efficiency of islet cell delivery as a therapy for type 1 diabetes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the omentum has gained significant attention as a pancreatic islet transplantation site, because it provides a large implantation volume, easy accessibility, and immunological privilege from host rejection of the implanted islets [34, 37]. However, there is still significant islet death in the omentum which is most likely associated with ischemia and inadequate nutrient supply due to incomplete revascularization [38]. Thus, rapid islet revascularization is important to provide sufficient nutrients and oxygen to the implanted islets; this is also essential for the survival of any other implanted tissues in the omentum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an angiogenic tissue engineering scaffold, the hybrid nanosack is expected to recruit and connect blood vessels from the host to the graft at the omentum by providing multi-stage release of FGF-2 and enhanced porous structures. Besides enhancing vascularization, the hybrid nanosack also prevents the leakage of implanted tissues from the omentum, which is another issue for the utilization of the omentum site [38]. By combining the desirable qualities of hydrogel and electrospun materials, we have developed a new class of tissue scaffold which can be applied to improve outcomes of tissue grafts requiring vascularization in the omentum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%