2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extremal problems related to maximal dyadic-like operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our aim in this article is to study this maximal operator and one way to do this is to find certain refinements of the inequalities satisfied by it such as (1.2) and (1.3). Concerning (1.2) refinements have been made in [8], [10] and [12]. Refinements of (1.3) can be found in [5] or even more general in [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our aim in this article is to study this maximal operator and one way to do this is to find certain refinements of the inequalities satisfied by it such as (1.2) and (1.3). Concerning (1.2) refinements have been made in [8], [10] and [12]. Refinements of (1.3) can be found in [5] or even more general in [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An approach for studying the dyadic maximal operator is by making certain refinements of the above inequalities. Concerning (1.2), some of them have been done in [6], [10], [11], [12], while for (1.3) the Bellman function of this operator has been explicetely computed in [3]. It is defined by the following way: For every f, F, L such E-mail address: lefteris@math.uoc.gr that 0 < f p ≤ F , L ≥ f the Bellman function of three variables associated to the dyadic maximal operator is defined by:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for every 0 < f ≤ p p−1 F , k ∈ [0, 1] and 1 < q < p. Secondly it is known by [10] that the following inequality…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to see that the weak type inequality (2) is the best possible. For refinements of this inequality see [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the proof we use a symmetrization principle which appears in [6]. We also refine (7) to a another direction; more precisely we prove the following.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%