2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0898-1221(00)00233-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extremality results for first-order discontinuous functional differential equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…t e / , at least between assumed lower or upper solutions (see Remark 2. Existence and comparison results derived in [1,2,[4][5][6]8,12,13,16,18,19] for initial value problems are special cases of the results derived above when <p is the identity function.…”
Section: This Illustrates the Need Of The Property Limsup^ G(t Y)mentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…t e / , at least between assumed lower or upper solutions (see Remark 2. Existence and comparison results derived in [1,2,[4][5][6]8,12,13,16,18,19] for initial value problems are special cases of the results derived above when <p is the identity function.…”
Section: This Illustrates the Need Of The Property Limsup^ G(t Y)mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…ii'(r) = g(t, «(/)), (1.1) with given initial or boundary conditions, has been proved under various kinds of hypotheses which allow g to be discontinuous in both its variables (see for example [1,2,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]16,18,19]). A culmination in this research was achieved in [5], where existence of extremal solutions of the initial value problem (1.1) was proved for a large class of discontinuous functions g. The results of [5] were applied in [18] to prove existence results for (1.1) equipped with discontinuous functional boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This equivalence is established by means of a change of variable developed in Section 4 in [6] and, independently, in [3]. In this sense, we can say that Theorem 3.1 in [6] also generalizes some existence results within the pioneer work developed in [4,[7][8][9][10] on equations of the form of (2). On the other hand, Theorem 3.1 in [6] also improves the main result in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In [1] the authors also consider functional-boundary conditions. However, the functional periodic conditions that we consider in this example are not covered by the main result in [1] because the assumptions that are required on the corresponding function B are rather strong. In particular, the reader can check that condition (B1) in [1] does not hold when trying to apply Theorem 3.1 in [1] to (4.1)-(4.2).…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%