2023
DOI: 10.3390/atmos14030542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extreme Low-Visibility Events Prediction Based on Inductive and Evolutionary Decision Rules: An Explicability-Based Approach

Abstract: In this paper, we propose different explicable forecasting approaches, based on inductive and evolutionary decision rules, for extreme low-visibility events prediction. Explicability of the processes given by the rules is in the core of the proposal. We propose two different methodologies: first, we apply the PRIM algorithm and evolution to obtain induced and evolved rules, and subsequently these rules and boxes of rules are used as a possible simpler alternative to ML/DL classifiers. Second, we propose to int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although AI models can provide accurate predictions, they often lack interpretability, making it challenging to identify the critical variables driving the occurrence of fog. Peláez-Rodríguez et al [22] propose different explainable forecasting approaches, based on inductive and evolutionary decision rules, for extreme low-visibility event predictions. The explainability of the processes derived from the rules generated by their system is one of the core objective of this work.…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although AI models can provide accurate predictions, they often lack interpretability, making it challenging to identify the critical variables driving the occurrence of fog. Peláez-Rodríguez et al [22] propose different explainable forecasting approaches, based on inductive and evolutionary decision rules, for extreme low-visibility event predictions. The explainability of the processes derived from the rules generated by their system is one of the core objective of this work.…”
Section: Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that the ensemble models and meteorological-based methods, which combined multiple deep learning architectures, achieved a better forecasting accuracy than the individual deep learning models. For the forecasting of lowvisibility conditions, Peláez-Rodríguez et al [21] proposed an iterative forward selection algorithm based on evolutionary algorithms, which was applied to determine the optimal variables and nodes in a region for each regressor model. Differential evolution and particle swarm optimization have been used as optimization algorithms, producing an improvement of up to 17.3% concerning the baseline databases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, neural networks require large datasets, high computational power to train the model initially, and time‐intensive fine‐tuning (Memon et al ., Memon et al ., 2019) which also has an impact on the environment in terms of carbon emission (Lacoste et al ., 2019). Furthermore, the use of complex ML (deep learning) algorithms compared to simpler ML algorithms does not always yield significantly better results at much higher computational costs (Peláez‐Rodríguez, Marina, et al ., 2023; Peláez‐Rodríguez, Pérez‐Aracil, et al ., 2023). In this study, we therefore aim to use the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%