2nd International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iwbf.2014.6914250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye detection by complex filtering for periocular recognition

Abstract: We present a novel system to localize the eye position based on symmetry filters. By using a 2D separable filter tuned to detect circular symmetries, detection is done with a few 1D convolutions. The detected eye center is used as input to our periocular algorithm based on retinotopic sampling grids and Gabor analysis of the local power spectrum. This setup is evaluated with two databases of iris data, one acquired with a close-up NIR camera, and another in visible light with a webcam. The periocular system sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the iris matchers, their performance is, in general, much better than the periocular matchers with NIR databases. This is expected, since iris systems usually work better in NIR range [6], and it confirms other studies using only BIOSEC and MobBIO databases [7]. On the other hand, the periocular matchers perform better than the iris matchers with VW data.…”
Section: Results: Individual Modalitiessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerning the iris matchers, their performance is, in general, much better than the periocular matchers with NIR databases. This is expected, since iris systems usually work better in NIR range [6], and it confirms other studies using only BIOSEC and MobBIO databases [7]. On the other hand, the periocular matchers perform better than the iris matchers with VW data.…”
Section: Results: Individual Modalitiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Also, Alonso-Fernandez and Bigun. [7] fused iris and periocular modalities using close-up NIR camera and VW webcam data. With NIR data, the iris matcher performed much better, and the fusion did not improve performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also conduct detection experiments to localize the eye center position, which is used as input of the GLCM feature extraction algorithm, so as to extract GLCM features in the relevant eye/periocular region only. For this purpose, we employ our eye detection algorithm based on symmetry filters [23]. A circular mask of radius R=60 pixels is placed in the eye center, masking the corresponding outer (periocular) or inner (eye) region, depending on the experiment at hand (see Figure 3).…”
Section: Database and Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A circular mask of radius R=60 pixels is placed in the eye center, masking the corresponding outer (periocular) or inner (eye) region, depending on the experiment at hand (see Figure 3). The radius has been chosen empirically, based on the maximum radius of the outer (sclera) iris circle obtained by ground-truth annotation of the MobBIO database [23]. Figure 4 shows the distribution of GLCM features on the real and fake iris images of the database (averaged between all images of each set, and normalized to the [0,1] range).…”
Section: Database and Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employ our eye detection algorithm based on symmetry filters described in [25]. A circular mask of fixed radius is placed in the eye center, masking the corresponding outer (periocular) or inner (eye) region, depending on the experiment at hand (Figure 3).…”
Section: Database and Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%