1979
DOI: 10.1080/10862967909547338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye Movement Dynamics of Good and Poor Readers: Then and Now

Abstract: While reading text, the eye movements of good and poor reading fifth graders, third graders and adults were assessed. Subjects were tested in two sessions one year apart. Dependent variables included the duration and frequency of forward going fixations and regressions; an analysis of individual differences was also made. Results showed that poor reading fifth graders have relatively unsystematic eye movement behavior with many more fixations of longer duration than other fifth graders and adults. The eye move… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
3

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These facts have been known for some time and have been reinforced by many recent studies (Adler-Grinberg & Stark, 1978;Eden, Stein, Wood, & Wood, 1994;Elterman, Abel, Daroff, Dell'Osso, & Bornstein, 1980;Lefton, Nagle, Johnson, & Fisher, 1979: Martos & Vila, 1990. Lefton et al (1979) found that normal developmental gains made by children (wherein fixation duration decreases, saccade length increases, and the frequency of regressions decreases) are not shown by dyslexic readers.…”
Section: Eye Movements Poor Readers and Dyslexiamentioning
confidence: 83%
“…These facts have been known for some time and have been reinforced by many recent studies (Adler-Grinberg & Stark, 1978;Eden, Stein, Wood, & Wood, 1994;Elterman, Abel, Daroff, Dell'Osso, & Bornstein, 1980;Lefton, Nagle, Johnson, & Fisher, 1979: Martos & Vila, 1990. Lefton et al (1979) found that normal developmental gains made by children (wherein fixation duration decreases, saccade length increases, and the frequency of regressions decreases) are not shown by dyslexic readers.…”
Section: Eye Movements Poor Readers and Dyslexiamentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The same holds true for fourth graders, whereas the word length span of sixth graders is as wide as that of the adults, that is, approximately 14 characters to the right of fixation. Even though the word length span does not develop after the sixth grade, readers still become more fluent in reading at a later stage, as witnessed by fewer forward fixations, fewer regressions, and longer and fewer saccades (Lefton, Nagle, Johnson, & Fisher, 1979;Rayner, 1998). Although the word length span of beginning readers is relatively large, it is evident that beginning readers devote most of their processing capacity to the currently fixated word; Rayner (1986) found that the smallest window size was least disrupting for the youngest readers.…”
Section: Development Of Components Of Global Perceptual Spanmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As a child makes age-appropriate progress in reading, fixation durations and the number of regressions decrease while saccade amplitudes increase (Lefton, Nagle, Johnson, & Fisher 1979). Dyslexic children exhibit more saccades, longer fixations, shorter saccade amplitudes, and a higher percentage of regressions than normal readers (Eden, Stein, Wood, & Wood 1994;Elterman, Abel, Daroff, Dell'Osso, & Bornstein 1980;Olson, Conners, & Rack 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%