Eye movements during speech planning: Talking about present and remembered objects

Meyer, Antje S.; Meulen, Femke F. van der; Brooks, Adrián

doi:10.1080/13506280344000248

Cited by 15 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Participants have completed a CLU, and presumably they look around the picture for the next situation to describe and simultaneously plan the next utterance (Meyer et al, 2004). This is supported by a number of studies concerning behavioural correlates of the precuneus (see Cavanna and Trimble (2006) for a recent review).…”

Section: Conceptual Planningmentioning

confidence: 98%

From a concept to a word in a syntactically complete sentence: An fMRI study on spontaneous language production in an overt picture description task

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Conceptual Planningmentioning

confidence: 98%

From a concept to a word in a syntactically complete sentence: An fMRI study on spontaneous language production in an overt picture description task

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Monitoring eye movements has become an invaluable method for psychologists who are studying many aspects of cognitive processing, including reading, language processing, language production, memory, and visual attention (Cherubini, Nüssli, & Dillenbourg, 2008;Duchowski, 2003;Griffin, 2004;Griffin & Oppenheimer, 2006;Meyer & Dobel, 2003;Meyer, van der Meulen, & Brooks, 2004;Rayner, 1998;Spivey & Geng, 2001;Trueswell & Tanenhaus, 2005; G. Van Gompel, Fischer, Murray, & Hill, 2007). Although recent technological advances have made eyetracking hardware increasingly robust and suitable for more active scenarios (Land, 2006(Land, , 2007, current software can register gaze only in terms of predefined, static regions of the screen.…”

Section: P Smentioning

confidence: 99%

Eyetracking for two-person tasks with manipulation of a virtual world

Carletta

Hill

Nicol

et al. 2010

Behavior Research Methods

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Eyetracking facilities are typically restricted to monitoring a single person viewing static images or prerecorded video. In the present article, we describe a system that makes it possible to study visual attention in coordination with other activity during joint action. The software links two eyetracking systems in parallel and provides an on-screen task. By locating eye movements against dynamic screen regions, it permits automatic tracking of moving on-screen objects. Using existing SR technology, the system can also cross-project each participant's eyetrack and mouse location onto the other's on-screen work space. Keeping a complete record of eyetrack and on-screen events in the same format as subsequent human coding, the system permits the analysis of multiple modalities. The software offers new approaches to spontaneous multimodal communication: joint action and joint attention. These capacities are demonstrated using an experimental paradigm for cooperative on-screen assembly of a two-dimensional model. The software is available under an open source license.

show abstract

“…It is not entirely clear how far looking must precede speech to influence its contents. Griffin (2004), Bock, Irwin, and Davidson (2004), and Meyer, van der Meulen, and Brooks (2004) cite latencies ranging from 300 to 1400 ms between initial gaze at a stimulus and naming or describing it. Latencies between a verbal contribution to dialogue and the next verbal turn averaged 418 ms in a co-present version of the map task (Bull, 1998).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%