2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01523.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye movements in German‐speaking children with and without dyslexia when reading aloud

Abstract: ABSTRACT.Purpose: The phonological difficulty and orthographic regularity of a language influence reading strategies. Only a few studies have been conducted in readers of German, which has a high grapheme-phoneme correspondence. The aim of this study was to investigate, firstly, the influence of different levels of phonological difficulty of reading material in German on reading in children and, secondly, to compare the reading strategies of German children with findings in English-speaking readers. Methods: E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
41
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(223 reference statements)
6
41
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in Chinese dyslexic children, Li et al [7] reported abnormal eye movements in picture searching, slow and more fixations and frequent saccades of small amplitude. Recently, Trauzettel-Klosinski et al [8] reported in German dyslexic children slower reading speed and high number of saccades and regressions; similar findings have been also reported in Greek dyslexic children by Hatzidaki et al [9].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Furthermore, in Chinese dyslexic children, Li et al [7] reported abnormal eye movements in picture searching, slow and more fixations and frequent saccades of small amplitude. Recently, Trauzettel-Klosinski et al [8] reported in German dyslexic children slower reading speed and high number of saccades and regressions; similar findings have been also reported in Greek dyslexic children by Hatzidaki et al [9].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The chief advantage of eye movement recording was that it allowed for a detailed investigation of the time course of possible crossorthographic differences in word processing. The current findings, hence, are more informative than earlier studies in single orthographies that have already suggested that there may be fine-grained differences in eye movement patterns depending on orthographic depth (e.g., Hutzler & Wimmer, 2004;Trauzettel-Klosinski et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…We examined single-word list reading as opposed to continuous texts (cf. Trauzettel-Klosinski et al, 2009), because (1) single words represent fundamental language units, (2) they allow to precisely control their length and frequency, and (3) unlike with texts, potential eye-movement effects are caused by the words' properties rather than by context, grammar, or syntax. In addition, we compare our results with evidence obtained for other regular languages and for English-speaking children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%