2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye Size at Birth in Prosimian Primates: Life History Correlates and Growth Patterns

Abstract: BackgroundPrimates have large eyes relative to head size, which profoundly influence the ontogenetic emergence of facial form. However, growth of the primate eye is only understood in a narrow taxonomic perspective, with information biased toward anthropoids.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe measured eye and bony orbit size in perinatal prosimian primates (17 strepsirrhine taxa and Tarsius syrichta) to infer the extent of prenatal as compared to postnatal eye growth. In addition, multiple linear regression was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows us to draw inferences about the relationship between midfacial length and developing teeth. Most variables were strongly correlated with CL (Table 2; and see Cummings, Muchlinski, Kirk et al, 2012). Therefore, residuals were calculated from a least-squares regression of dental and life history variables versus CL (e.g., relative dental volume).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This allows us to draw inferences about the relationship between midfacial length and developing teeth. Most variables were strongly correlated with CL (Table 2; and see Cummings, Muchlinski, Kirk et al, 2012). Therefore, residuals were calculated from a least-squares regression of dental and life history variables versus CL (e.g., relative dental volume).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Residuals can be used to demonstrate how a measurement varies “away from an expected or detected trend” (Pagel and Harvey, , p. 422). Specifically, the residuals calculated here represent deviations from best‐fit regression lines, as in numerous previous studies (e.g., Harvey et al, ; Cummings et al, ). Positive values indicate a relatively greater‐than‐expected size of a given variable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The eyeballs was measured according to the method described by Cummings et al (2012), Kirk (2004Kirk ( , 2006 and Lluch, Ventura, and Lopez-Fuster (2008). The axial eye diameter (from the anterior cornea to the root of the optic nerve), the maximum transverse (equatorial) eye diameter, the minimum transverse (equatorial) eye diameter, the minimum and maximum corneal diameter, the corneal thickness, the lens thickness, the aqueous humour thickness, the vitreous humour thickness and the values of six random measurements of the whole eyeball were analysed statistically and expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD).…”
Section: Macroscopic Studymentioning
confidence: 99%