2006
DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye size in geckos: Asymmetry, allometry, sexual dimorphism, and behavioral correlates

Abstract: The function of the vertebrate eye depends on its absolute size, and the size is presumably adapted to specific needs. We studied the variation of eye size at all levels, from intra-individual to inter-specific, in lid- less, spectacled, gecko lizards (Gekkonomorpha). We mea sured 1,408 museum specimens of 62 species, representing subfamilies Diplodactylinae, Gekkoninae, and Sphaerodactylinae. Intra-individually, eye size showed significant directional asymmetry in Stenodactylus sthenodactylus. A latitudinal s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
63
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
6
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unclear to what extent the traits of auditory function, which differ between the species studied here, really characterize the relevant higher gekkotan taxa, Eublepharidae and Diplodactylidae. To the extent that they do, these functional differences would accord with other morphological differences between these groups in middleear morphology [51], the vertebrae [41], and another gekkotan size-dependent sensory organ, the eye [45] and eyelids [19]. The fact that auditory sensitivity correlates with body size, intra-and interspecifically, has been interpreted as partly deriving from two morphological factors: (1) the number of hair cells in the inner ear that interspecifically (not intraspecifically) correlates with animal size; (2) the hydraulic lever in the middle ear's impedance matching mechanism (the ratio of tympanic membrane area to columella footplate area increases both inter-and intraspecifically with animal size).…”
Section: Conclusion and Evolutionary Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is unclear to what extent the traits of auditory function, which differ between the species studied here, really characterize the relevant higher gekkotan taxa, Eublepharidae and Diplodactylidae. To the extent that they do, these functional differences would accord with other morphological differences between these groups in middleear morphology [51], the vertebrae [41], and another gekkotan size-dependent sensory organ, the eye [45] and eyelids [19]. The fact that auditory sensitivity correlates with body size, intra-and interspecifically, has been interpreted as partly deriving from two morphological factors: (1) the number of hair cells in the inner ear that interspecifically (not intraspecifically) correlates with animal size; (2) the hydraulic lever in the middle ear's impedance matching mechanism (the ratio of tympanic membrane area to columella footplate area increases both inter-and intraspecifically with animal size).…”
Section: Conclusion and Evolutionary Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The difference may have either or both reasons: First, RA as a factor may be emphasized in E. macularius because of its much wider range of values in our sample due to the availability of smaller juveniles. Second, evolutionary divergence between gekkotan groups (E. macularius, Eublepharidae; O. marmorata, Diplodactylidae); for example, Diplodactylidae and Gekkoninae differ in eye allometry [45].…”
Section: Interpretation Of Intraspecific Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We provide the first detailed analysis of the diet of P. martini based on specimens collected from around the island of Curaçao and test whether transitions to suburban habitats lead to a shift in dietary resources indicating dietary flexibility. Because many geckos are sexually dimorphic (Kratochvíl and Frynta 2002;Werner and Seifan 2006;Starostová et al 2010), including other species of Phyllodactylus (Ramírez-Sandoval et al 2006), we compare feeding habits between sexes to account for the possibility of males and females utilizing different prey resources. We contrast this data with a morphometric data set of limb and cranial elements in P. martini to test for the potential for sexual dimorphism as well as correlations between phenotype and diet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Orbit size is related to eye size, which in turn is correlated with parameters of behavioral ecology; in gekkotans the eye is larger in nocturnal than in diurnal species and in cursorial than in scansorial species (Werner and Seifan, 2006). Some gekkotans are lidless and the eye is covered by a fixed transparent window or spectacle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%