2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye tracking cognitive load using pupil diameter and microsaccades with fixed gaze

Abstract: Pupil diameter and microsaccades are captured by an eye tracker and compared for their suitability as indicators of cognitive load (as beset by task difficulty). Specifically, two metrics are tested in response to task difficulty: (1) the change in pupil diameter with respect to inter- or intra-trial baseline, and (2) the rate and magnitude of microsaccades. Participants performed easy and difficult mental arithmetic tasks while fixating a central target. Inter-trial change in pupil diameter and microsaccade m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
100
4
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
6
100
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the current work focused on high-level, global features as they are more generalizable, are robust to tracking errors, and matched the level of resolution (page and text level) of comprehension assessments. However, future studies may consider whether including locally mapped features improves prediction accuracy, alongside other more fine-grained features not used in the present study, such as pupil diameter and microsaccades, which are known to reflect processes relevant to reading comprehension such as cognitive load (Krejtz, Duchowski, Niedzielska, Biele, & Krejtz, 2018). It is also worth noting that the present study used eye trackers with relatively low sampling rates of 60-120 Hz, which renders measurement of saccade length somewhat imprecise, so replication with more advanced eye tracking is warranted.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the current work focused on high-level, global features as they are more generalizable, are robust to tracking errors, and matched the level of resolution (page and text level) of comprehension assessments. However, future studies may consider whether including locally mapped features improves prediction accuracy, alongside other more fine-grained features not used in the present study, such as pupil diameter and microsaccades, which are known to reflect processes relevant to reading comprehension such as cognitive load (Krejtz, Duchowski, Niedzielska, Biele, & Krejtz, 2018). It is also worth noting that the present study used eye trackers with relatively low sampling rates of 60-120 Hz, which renders measurement of saccade length somewhat imprecise, so replication with more advanced eye tracking is warranted.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in pupil size can also be a measure of stress experienced in reaction to presented visual materials [38]. It should be remembered, however, that this relationship is complex, since the pupil size can be also related to the load of cognitive processing [26,39,40,41], the quantity of light 1 or the colour in the sight stimuli and luminance-contrast [42,43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, depending on the anomaly, experts employ a 138 mixture of focal and diffusive, or ambient, gaze strategies [44][45][46]; however, they are 139 more accurate at determining anomalies than novices and intermediates. 140 Beyond gaze strategies based on fixations and saccades, other forms of eye 141 movements that have been used to measure aspects of cognition during visual search 142 include their speed and direction [5], microsaccades [47], pupil diameter oscillation [48], 143 and measures related to pupil diameter itself [49]. Generally, most of these measures 144 concentrating on estimation of cognitive load have produced metrics sensitive to the 145 presence or absence of cognitive load.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%