2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40037-019-0506-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eye tracking: the silver bullet of competency assessment in medical image interpretation?

Abstract: None

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a high level of experience is assumed to be related to more accurate diagnoses, there is yet limited evidence that scroll-data or even eye-tracking metrics relate to observers’ diagnostic accuracy. However, such a relationship is required if those metrics are to be used for assessment or adaptive instruction (Kok 2019 ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although a high level of experience is assumed to be related to more accurate diagnoses, there is yet limited evidence that scroll-data or even eye-tracking metrics relate to observers’ diagnostic accuracy. However, such a relationship is required if those metrics are to be used for assessment or adaptive instruction (Kok 2019 ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Errors in medical image interpretation can have significant impact on patient safety, so high-quality residency training programs are crucial for patient safety. Process measures are increasingly valued as additional sources of information about residents’ competence (Kok 2019 ), for example in the context of (formative) assessment and monitoring. Process measures such as computer-log data (time-stamped information on interactions with the computer, for example, scrolling, panning, windowing and zooming) and eye tracking data (time-stamped information on where a person looks, how long and in what order; Kok and Jarodzka 2016 ) provide information that goes beyond outcome variables, for example, about the efficiency of visual search and strategies use (Drew et al 2013 ; Manning et al 2006 ; Venjakob et al 2012 ; Van der Gijp et al 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%