2003
DOI: 10.2514/2.5028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

F-14 Aircraft Lateral-Directional Adaptive Control Using Subspace Stabilization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, traditional control methods, merely considering the stability and safety of UAV, cannot meet the high-precision landing requirements. In order to enhance the maneuvering ability of UAV, considerable research efforts have been devoted [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. With the advantage of quick response, variable structure control strategy has been widely adopted [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, traditional control methods, merely considering the stability and safety of UAV, cannot meet the high-precision landing requirements. In order to enhance the maneuvering ability of UAV, considerable research efforts have been devoted [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. With the advantage of quick response, variable structure control strategy has been widely adopted [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, a nonlinear dynamic inversion method is consolidated with a conventional PID control for designing an ACLS, which efficiently performs in presence of airwakes (Singh and Padhi, 2009). Additionally, several advanced control schemes have been proposed for the development of ACLS or as an aircraft’s tracking control such as adaptive control (Tournes and Landrum, 2003), observer-based backstepping control (Zheng et al , 2017a, 2017b), robust controller (Raza et al , 2020), adaptive sliding mode control (Zheng et al , 2017a, 2017b), intelligent fault-tolerant control (Taimoor et al , 2020; Taimoor and Li, 2020a, 2020b) and intelligent control (Bourmistrova and Khantsis, 2007; Deng and Duan, 2016; Juang and Cheng, 2006; Li and Duan, 2015). However, these methods are not very easy to implement in real applications and very few of them have considered deck motion compensation (DMC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%