2000
DOI: 10.1007/s001250051469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

F-wave latency serves as the most reproducible measure in nerve conduction studies of diabetic polyneuropathy: multicentre analysis in healthy subjects and patients with diabetic polyneuropathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
97
1
15

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
12
97
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimum F-wave latency (MFWL) was measured in the median and tibial motor nerves. The nerve conduction velocity and MFWL were measured by electromyography at 32-34°C, in accordance with the method proposed by Kohara et al [3]. The F-wave was measured 16 times, and the minimum was adopted as the value for this analysis.…”
Section: Classification Of the Severity Of Microvascular And Macrovasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum F-wave latency (MFWL) was measured in the median and tibial motor nerves. The nerve conduction velocity and MFWL were measured by electromyography at 32-34°C, in accordance with the method proposed by Kohara et al [3]. The F-wave was measured 16 times, and the minimum was adopted as the value for this analysis.…”
Section: Classification Of the Severity Of Microvascular And Macrovasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of (sensory) amplitudes, the nerve was scored as abnormal. Otherwise, the use of relative amplitudes was omitted because of the large variability in healthy subjects and diabetic patients (18). An overall NCS score was defined as the number of these four nerves with an abnormal conduction velocity, ranging from 0 (all normal) to 4 (all abnormal).…”
Section: Clinical Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A NCS is one of the most sensitive tests because it can detect DSPN prior to the occurrence of clinical symptoms and it is widely considered as an excellent test even in the prognostic assessment of the disease through follow-up study [14][15][16] . NCSs can be divided into motor, sensory, mixed, and late response (H-reflex and F-wave) tests through which the function of the peripheral nerves can be assessed objectively and quantitatively [17][18][19][20][21] . Sensory NCSs (SNCSs) are usually used in the early detection of subclinical diabetes or in the differential diagnosis and screening of DSPN 22,23) , because the sensory nerves are generally damaged prior to motor nerve damage of the peripheral nerves [24][25][26] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%