SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2008 2008
DOI: 10.1190/1.3063880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

F‐xy Cadzow noise suppression

Abstract: Cadzow filtering has previously been applied along constant-frequency slices to remove random noise from 2-D seismic data. Here I extend Cadzow filtering to two or more spatial dimensions. The resulting method is superior to both f-xy prediction (deconvolution) and projection filtering, especially for very noisy data. In particular, it preserves signal better and can be made much harsher.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For convenience, we choose L ¼ b N 2 c þ 1 to make the Hankel matrix approximately square (Trickett, 2008;Oropeza and Sacchi, 2011), MðωÞ ∈ C L×ðN−Lþ1Þ . We will omit the symbol ω and understand that the analysis is carried out for all frequencies.…”
Section: Singular Spectrum Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For convenience, we choose L ¼ b N 2 c þ 1 to make the Hankel matrix approximately square (Trickett, 2008;Oropeza and Sacchi, 2011), MðωÞ ∈ C L×ðN−Lþ1Þ . We will omit the symbol ω and understand that the analysis is carried out for all frequencies.…”
Section: Singular Spectrum Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, eigenimage filtering (Ulrych et al, 1988), similar to filtering via the Karhunen-Loève transform (Jones and Levy, 1987), can operate directly on the seismic data in the t-x or f-x-y domain (Trickett, 2003). Recently, the singular spectrum analysis (SSA) method (Sacchi, 2009;Oropeza and Sacchi, 2011), also known as Cadzow filtering (Trickett, 2008;Trickett and Burroughs, 2009), was introduced to attenuate incoherent noise and for seismic data reconstruction (Oropeza and Sacchi, 2011;Gao et al, 2013). It is also important to note that reduced-rank filtering based on SSA has been also used to suppress coherent noise (Nagarajappa, 2012;Chiu, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DL methods have proven to perform well for denoising seismic data (Beckouche and Ma, 2014;Liang et al, 2014;Yu et al, 2015Yu et al, , 2016Zhu et al, 2015;Turquais et al, 2017). Another data-driven method, the Cadzow filtering method (Trickett, 2002(Trickett, , 2008, also called singular spectrum analysis (SSA) (Sacchi, 2009;Chen and Sacchi, 2015), uses rank reduction for denoising. This method embeds each frequency slice of the data into a Hankel matrix, mutes the low singular values, and averages the antidiagonal elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, random noise in seismic data are assumed to have a Gaussian distribution, with SNR related to √ N where N is the number of sensors. Assuming noise with Gaussian distribution, rank reduction based methods work pretty well for denoising data [8,9,10,11]. Rank reduction methods work on the assumption that within a small spatio-temporal seismic window, seismic reflections are linear events with different dips (gradients).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rank reduction methods work on the assumption that within a small spatio-temporal seismic window, seismic reflections are linear events with different dips (gradients). In these methods [8,9,10,11], data are first transformed to the Fourier domain in the temporal direction (also known as Fx transform [7]) and then for every frequency slice, rank reduction is applied on the Hankel matrix to remove incoherent signals. Cadzow's algorithm [12], popular in array processing, can also be applied for further noise reduction [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%