2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication and characterization of CdS doped ZnO nano thick films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 44 ] A relatively smaller ionic radius of dopants shrinks the ZnO lattice resulting in a decrease in the relative intensity of the diffraction peaks and their corresponding left shift. [ 45,46 ] This can be confirmed in our results reported in supplementary material, where it is possible to observe the relative intensity peak differences, where doped samples display a reduction of the intensity with reference to the undoped sample (Table S1, Supporting Information). Also, it is well known that the doping generates both oxygen vacancies on the surface and substitutional defects in the bulk reducing the crystallinity of the doped ZnO nanoparticle, which subsequently up‐turns both dislocation density and the average microstrain of the doped samples, [ 47,48 ] as shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…[ 44 ] A relatively smaller ionic radius of dopants shrinks the ZnO lattice resulting in a decrease in the relative intensity of the diffraction peaks and their corresponding left shift. [ 45,46 ] This can be confirmed in our results reported in supplementary material, where it is possible to observe the relative intensity peak differences, where doped samples display a reduction of the intensity with reference to the undoped sample (Table S1, Supporting Information). Also, it is well known that the doping generates both oxygen vacancies on the surface and substitutional defects in the bulk reducing the crystallinity of the doped ZnO nanoparticle, which subsequently up‐turns both dislocation density and the average microstrain of the doped samples, [ 47,48 ] as shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Thin films consisting of (CdS/ZnO) nanocomposites have been widely explored due to their applications in the area of optoelectronic, photo-catalysis and optics. [8][9][10][11][12] The CdS possesses a narrow direct optical band gap (∼ 2.4 eV) and is extensively used as a visible light photocatalyst. The CdS is the most appropriate visible sensitizer for zinc oxide (ZnO) because its crystal lattice constant is similar to that of ZnO, having the optical band-gap energy in the visible light region creating a heterojunction with zinc oxide, which enables a very fast interband electronic charge transfer between these compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crystalline size can be calculated by the well-known formula given by the Debye Scherer relationship. 22,23 In this case, k = 0.94, where λ is the X-ray source's wavelength, β is the full width at half maximum (FWHM), and θ is the diffraction angle. The crystallite sizes of samples S 1 , S 2 , and S 3 are found at 25.1 nm, 16.1 nm, and 13.9 nm, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crystalline size can be calculated by the well-known formula given by the Debye Scherer relationship. 22,23 D ¼ lk b cos q…”
Section: Xrdmentioning
confidence: 99%